Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30136381›Full record

ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2018

Machine learning in major depression: From classification to treatment outcome prediction.

Shuang Gao, Vince D Calhoun, Jing Sui

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 373 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuang GaoBrainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8747-8781
Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, New Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9058-0747
Jing SuiBrainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6837-5966
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNMind Research Network · US

Funding

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI BEDRICK, EDWARD J · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
Mining the Genomewide Scan: Genetic Profiles of Structural Loss in Schizophrenia: AD/ADRD supplementR01MH094524 · NIMH · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, TURNER, JESS · 2012 to 2021
$6.3M
Informed Data-Driven Fusion of Behavior, Brain Function, and GenesR01EB005846 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2005 to 2016
$5.5M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
Data-driven approaches to identify biomarkers from multimodal imaging big dataR56MH117107 · NIMH · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI SUI, JING · 2018 to 2018
$453k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005846NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094524NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH117107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMajor depression disorder (MDD) is the single greatest cause of disability and morbidity, and affects about 10% of the population worldwide. Currently, there are no clinically useful diagnostic biomarkers that are able to confirm a diagnosis of MDD from bipolar disorder (BD) in the early depressive episode. Therefore, exploring translational biomarkers of mood disorders based on machine learning is in pressing need, though it is challenging, but with great potential to improve our understanding of these disorders. DISCUSSIONS: In this study, we review popular machine-learning methods used for brain imaging classification and predictions, and provide an overview of studies, specifically for MDD, that have used magnetic resonance imaging data to either (a) classify MDDs from controls or other mood disorders or (b) investigate treatment outcome predictors for individual patients. Finally, challenges, future directions, and potential limitations related to MDD biomarker identification are also discussed, with a goal of offering a comprehensive overview that may help readers to better understand the applications of neuroimaging data mining in depression.

conclusionsWe hope such efforts may highlight the need for an urgently needed paradigm shift in treatment, to guide personalized optimal clinical care.

Indexed as

Machine LearningTreatment OutcomeAnimalsBrainHumansMajor Depressive DisorderNeural PathwaysPsychiatric Status Rating Scalesclassificationmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingmajor depressive disorderreview

Identifiers

PMID30136381
PMCPMC6324186
OpenAlexW2888505821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.