Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30136285›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2018

Fully automatic multi-organ segmentation for head and neck cancer radiotherapy using shape representation model constrained fully convolutional neural networks.

Nuo Tong, Shuiping Gou, Shuyuan Yang, Dan Ruan, Ke Sheng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Multimodal PET-MR segmentation for glioblastoma: complementarity for treatment planning and recurrence definition.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex-Based Bias in Artificial Intelligence-Based Segmentation Models in Clinical Oncology.Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2025
    Review
  12. Ensemble of LinkNet Networks for Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation.Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation for MR-Guided Applications : First MICCAI Challenge, HNTS-MRG 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 17, 2024, proceedings · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nuo TongKey Lab of Intelligent Perception and Image Understanding of Ministry of Education, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710071, China.
Shuiping GouKey Lab of Intelligent Perception and Image Understanding of Ministry of Education, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710071, China.
Shuyuan YangKey Lab of Intelligent Perception and Image Understanding of Ministry of Education, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710071, China.
Dan RuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Ke ShengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USXidian University · CN

Funding

Development of a versatile robotic radiation therapy systemR44CA183390 · NCI · RADIABEAM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC · PI SHENG, KE, YONEMOTO, JAY · 2017 to 2024
$5.8M
Motion Management of Pancreatic Cancer in MRI-Guided RadiotherapyR01CA188300 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHENG, KE · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
(NCI) Developing an Intermediate Energy Linac for Robotic RadiotherapyR43CA183390 · NCI · RADIABEAM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC · PI BOUCHER, SALIME · 2015 to 2016
$265k
DOE DE-SC0017057DOE DE-SC0017687National Natural Science Foundation of China 61472306NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188300NCI NIH HHS R43 CA183390NCI NIH HHS R44 CA183390NIH HHS R01CA18830NIH HHS R43CA183390NIH HHS R44CA183390The Scientific and Technological Plan Program in Hangzhou City of China 20160533B71The Technological Application Research Plan Program for Public Welfare in Zhejiang Province of China 2015C31167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is commonly employed for treating head and neck (H&N) cancer with uniform tumor dose and conformal critical organ sparing. Accurate delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs) on H&N CT images is thus essential to treatment quality. Manual contouring used in current clinical practice is tedious, time-consuming, and can produce inconsistent results. Existing automated segmentation methods are challenged by the substantial inter-patient anatomical variation and low CT soft tissue contrast. To overcome the challenges, we developed a novel automated H&N OARs segmentation method that combines a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) with a shape representation model (SRM).

methodsBased on manually segmented H&N CT, the SRM and FCNN were trained in two steps: (a) SRM learned the latent shape representation of H&N OARs from the training dataset; (b) the pre-trained SRM with fixed parameters were used to constrain the FCNN training. The combined segmentation network was then used to delineate nine OARs including the brainstem, optic chiasm, mandible, optical nerves, parotids, and submandibular glands on unseen H&N CT images. Twenty-two and 10 H&N CT scans provided by the Public Domain Database for Computational Anatomy (PDDCA) were utilized for training and validation, respectively. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (SEN), average surface distance (ASD), and 95% maximum surface distance (95%SD) were calculated to quantitatively evaluate the segmentation accuracy of the proposed method. The proposed method was compared with an active appearance model that won the 2015 MICCAI H&N Segmentation Grand Challenge based on the same dataset, an atlas method and a deep learning method based on different patient datasets.

resultsAn average DSC = 0.870 (brainstem), DSC = 0.583 (optic chiasm), DSC = 0.937 (mandible), DSC = 0.653 (left optic nerve), DSC = 0.689 (right optic nerve), DSC = 0.835 (left parotid), DSC = 0.832 (right parotid), DSC = 0.755 (left submandibular), and DSC = 0.813 (right submandibular) were achieved. The segmentation results are consistently superior to the results of atlas and statistical shape based methods as well as a patch-wise convolutional neural network method. Once the networks are trained off-line, the average time to segment all 9 OARs for an unseen CT scan is 9.5 s.

conclusionExperiments on clinical datasets of H&N patients demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed deep neural network segmentation method for multi-organ segmentation on volumetric CT scans. The accuracy and robustness of the segmentation were further increased by incorporating shape priors using SMR. The proposed method showed competitive performance and took shorter time to segment multiple organs in comparison to state of the art methods.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutomationHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, TheoreticalOrgans at Riskfully convolutional neural networkhead and neck cancerimage segmentationshape representation model

Identifiers

PMID30136285
PMCPMC6181786
OpenAlexW2888667538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.