ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019
Traditional machine learning for limited angle tomography.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning in TCM with natural products and molecules: current status and future perspectives.Chinese medicine · 2023Review
- Two-stage deep learning network-based few-view image reconstruction for parallel-beam projection tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Limited angle tomography for transmission X-ray microscopy using deep learning.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe application of traditional machine learning techniques, in the form of regression models based on conventional, "hand-crafted" features, to artifact reduction in limited angle tomography is investigated.
methodsMean-variation-median (MVM), Laplacian, Hessian, and shift-variant data loss (SVDL) features are extracted from the images reconstructed from limited angle data. The regression models linear regression (LR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and reduced-error pruning tree (REPTree) are applied to predict artifact images.
resultsREPTree learns artifacts best and reaches the smallest root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 29 HU for the Shepp-Logan phantom in a parallel-beam study. Further experiments demonstrate that the MVM and Hessian features complement each other, whereas the Laplacian feature is redundant in the presence of MVM. In fan-beam, the SVDL features are also beneficial. A preliminary experiment on clinical data in a fan-beam study demonstrates that REPTree can reduce some artifacts for clinical data. However, it is not sufficient as a lot of incorrect pixel intensities still remain in the estimated reconstruction images.
conclusionREPTree has the best performance on learning artifacts in limited angle tomography compared with LR and MLP. The features of MVM, Hessian, and SVDL are beneficial for artifact prediction in limited angle tomography. Preliminary experiments on clinical data suggest that the investigation on more features is necessary for clinical applications of REPTree.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.