ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2018
Circulatory Mechanotherapeutics: Moving with the Force.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Continuous-Flow: The Next Wave of Fully Implantable LVADs and Total Artificial Hearts.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Physiologic effects of different hemodynamic patterns of LVAD.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review describes the current state of advancements in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices with significantly improved hemodynamic performance and decreased adverse events. Novel considerations for future MCS designs that impart spiral flow regimes will be detailed. RECENT
findingsSignificant challenges in MCS device use have included size reduction, premature pump mechanical bearing failure, acquired bleeding disorders, and vascular complications related to high shear forces and jetting. Some of these problems have been improved upon, such as the use of magnetically levitated impellers and hydrodynamic bearings. The relative simplicity of continuous flow pumps has also enabled their miniaturization, portability, and reduced energy consumption. Recent studies by our group demonstrated that spiral forms of flow possess hemodynamically beneficial attributes at the MCS outflow cannula and aorta interface, reducing jet impact, organizing streamlines, and thereby improving endothelial function through wall shear stress modulation. Despite MCS design improvements, they are far from perfect. Induced spiral fluid modulation may help address the known flow-mediated disturbances in vascular mechanobiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.