ReviewDer Pathologe2018
[Histopathology and clinical aspects of extrauterine pregnancy].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ectopic pregnancies are the main sources of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality in the first trimester. They are usually located in the ampullary part of the fallopian tube and the incidence increases in the setting of assisted reproductive techniques, older age at the time of the first pregnancy, and prior adnexal procedures. The clinical aspects and diagnostic challenges of an ectopic pregnancy for the pathologist are to be outlined. A review of the relevant literature was performed. Proof of gestational tissue is of utmost importance in the pathological-anatomical evaluation of an ectopic pregnancy. A complete evaluation of the specimen of a presumed tubal abruption or after milking out should be performed. Abnormal placentations (blighted ovum, embryonal molar pregnancy) as well as gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD, e.g., partial/complete molar pregnancy, choriocarcinoma) can occur in the setting of an ectopic pregnancy. Caution must be taken to differentiate a trophoblast hyperplasia secondary to the tubal microenvironment from GTD. p57 immunohistochemistry can help exclude a molar pregnancy. Only 50% of ectopic pregnancies are associated with tubal pathologies (e. g. inflammation, tubal adhesions). Chorionic villi and trophoblast epithelia can demonstrate regressive changes after prior methotrexate treatment. Rarely, immunohistochemistry with GATA-3, p63, β‑HCG, PAX-8, and WT-1 can be used in the differential diagnosis of trophoblastic epithelium. Ectopic pregnancies are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A thorough evaluation of the specimen can help guide management and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.