Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135957›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies2017

EarBit: Using Wearable Sensors to Detect Eating Episodes in Unconstrained Environments.

Abdelkareem Bedri, Richard Li, Malcolm Haynes, Raj Prateek Kosaraju, Ishaan Grover, Temiloluwa Prioleau, Min Yan Beh, Mayank Goel, Thad Starner, Gregory Abowd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Collecting Self-reported Physical Activity and Posture Data Using Audio-based Ecological Momentary Assessment.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2024
    Article
  9. HabitSense: A Privacy-Aware, AI-Enhanced Multimodal Wearable Platform for mHealth Applications.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2024
    Article
  10. Domain-Agnostic Representation of Side-Channels.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Experience: Barriers and Opportunities of Wearables for Eating Research.Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. ActiSight: Wearer Foreground Extraction Using a Practical RGB-Thermal Wearable.Proceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications. IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdelkareem BedriCarnegie Mellon University, Carnegie Mellon, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, US.
Richard LiGeorgia Institute of Technology, 85 5th St NW, Atlanta, GA 30308, US.
Malcolm HaynesUnited States Military Academy, Thayer Hall, West Point, NY 10996, US.
Raj Prateek KosarajuStanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, US.
Ishaan GroverMassachusetts Institute of Technology, 20 Ames St, Cambridge, MA 02139, US.
Temiloluwa PrioleauRice University, 6100 Main St. Houston TX 77005 US.
Min Yan BehCarnegie Mellon University, Carnegie Mellon, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, US.
Mayank GoelCarnegie Mellon University, Carnegie Mellon, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, US.
Thad StarnerGeorgia Institute of Technology, 85 5th St NW, Atlanta, GA 30308, US.
Gregory AbowdGeorgia Institute of Technology, 85 5th St NW, Atlanta, GA 30308, US.

Funding

TRAINING U54EB020404 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI KUMAR, SANTOSH · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic and widespread diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia require patients to monitor their food intake, and food journaling is currently the most common method for doing so. However, food journaling is subject to self-bias and recall errors, and is poorly adhered to by patients. In this paper, we propose an alternative by introducing EarBit, a wearable system that detects eating moments. We evaluate the performance of inertial, optical, and acoustic sensing modalities and focus on inertial sensing, by virtue of its recognition and usability performance. Using data collected in a simulated home setting with minimum restrictions on participants' behavior, we build our models and evaluate them with an unconstrained outside-the-lab study. For both studies, we obtained video footage as ground truth for participants activities. Using leave-one-user-out validation, EarBit recognized all the eating episodes in the semi-controlled lab study, and achieved an accuracy of 90.1% and an F

Indexed as

activity recognitionApplied computing →Health informaticsautomatic dietary monitoringchewing detectionComputing methodologies →Supervised learning by classificationearablesHardware →Sensor devices and platformsHuman-centered computing →Ubiquitous and mobile computing design and evaluation methodsunconstraint environmentWearable computing

Identifiers

PMID30135957
PMCPMC6101257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.