Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135900›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of physiotherapy2017

Using the World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule (2) to assess disability in community-dwelling stroke patients.

Ayorinde I Arowoiya, Toughieda Elloker, Farahana Karachi, Nondwe Mlenzana, Lee-Ann Jacobs-Nzuzi Khuabi, Anthea Rhoda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of return to work among stroke survivors in south-west Nigeria.Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ayorinde I ArowoiyaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Community & Health Science, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.
Toughieda EllokerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Community & Health Science, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.
Farahana KarachiDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Community & Health Science, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.
Nondwe MlenzanaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Community & Health Science, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.
Lee-Ann Jacobs-Nzuzi KhuabiDivision of Occupational Therapy, Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0684-5373
Anthea RhodaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Community & Health Science, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5995-0321
Western Cape Department of Health · ZAStellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasurement of the extent of disability post-stroke is important to determine the impact of disability on these individuals and the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing the impact of their disability. Instruments used to measure disability should, however, be culturally sensitive.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to conduct a disability assessment using the World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS).

methodsA cross-sectional design was used. The study population included a conveniently selected 226 stroke patients living within community settings. These patients were followed up 6-12 months following the onset of the stroke and are currently residing in the community. Disability was measured using the WHODAS 2.0 and the data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The WHODAS 2.0 enabled the assessment of disability within the domains of cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along with others, household activities, work activities and participation. Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the University of the Western Cape.

resultsIn this sample, the domain mostly affected were household activities, with 38% having extreme difficulty with conducting these activities. This was followed by mobility (27%) and self-care (25%) being the domains that participants also had extreme difficulty with. Getting along with others was the domain that most (51%) of the participants had no difficulty with. ANOVA one-way test showed no significant association of participation restrictions with demographics factors.

conclusionRehabilitation of patients with stroke should focus on the patient's ability to engage in household activities, mobility and self-care.

Identifiers

PMID30135900
PMCPMC6093092
OpenAlexW2615348822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.