Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135842›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2017

A pilot randomized controlled trial of E-care for caregivers: An internet intervention for caregivers of depressed patients.

Lisette Bijker, Annet Kleiboer, Heleen M Riper, Pim Cuijpers, Tara Donker

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisette BijkerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Movement- and Behavioral Sciences, VU Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annet KleiboerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Movement- and Behavioral Sciences, VU Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heleen M RiperDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Movement- and Behavioral Sciences, VU Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Movement- and Behavioral Sciences, VU Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tara DonkerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Movement- and Behavioral Sciences, VU Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression has a high impact on both patients and the people around them. These non-professional caregivers often experience overburdening and are at risk for developing psychological symptoms themselves. Internet interventions have the potential to be accessible and (cost)-effective in terms of reducing and preventing psychological symptoms. Less is known about their potential to decrease psychological distress among caregivers. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate (1) the user-friendliness and (2) the initial short-term effects on psychological distress of 'E-care for caregivers', an internet based guided self-management intervention for non-professional caregivers of depressed patients.

methodsA pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT:

resultsAll participants were recruited within six weeks through online advertising. Two-thirds of participants experienced higher levels of psychological distress (K10 > 20). The internet intervention was evaluated as user-friendly by caregivers (average score of 81.5, range [0-100]). Results did not show a reduction in psychological distress or other secondary outcome measures. Sensitivity analyses showed a decreased quality of life in the control condition compared to the intervention condition ( DISCUSSION: The internet intervention was evaluated positively for usability and was considered as easy to use. The study did not show a reduction in symptoms of psychological distress. However, there were some indications that those completing the internet intervention perceived higher levels of mastery and a protective effect in quality of life post-intervention. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: As far as we know, this study is the first to examine the user-friendliness and initial effects of an internet intervention specifically designed for non-professional caregivers of depressed patients. As this was a pilot study, the findings should be interpreted with caution. We recommend investigating the possibilities of providing a (partially) sequential design as well as incorporating themes like stigma and expressed emotion in the online course and subsequent evaluation of the internet intervention in a full-scale RCT, with a six-month follow-up.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register: NTR5268. Registered on 30 June 2015.

Indexed as

CaregiversDepressionInternet interventionPilot studyPsychological distressUser-friendliness

Identifiers

PMID30135842
PMCPMC6096299
OpenAlexW2733183742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.