Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135821›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2017

User characteristics and usage of an open access moderated internet support group for depression and other mental disorders: A prospective study.

Kathleen M Griffiths, Bradley Carron-Arthur, Julia Reynolds, Kylie Bennett, Anthony Bennett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Designing Mental Health Technologies that Support the Social Ecosystem of College Students.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathleen M GriffithsResearch School of Psychology, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Bradley Carron-ArthurCentre for Mental Health Research, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Julia ReynoldsCentre for Mental Health Research, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Kylie BennettResearch School of Psychology, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Anthony BennettResearch School of Psychology, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Australian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternet support groups (ISGs) for mental ill-health are common but little is known about the characteristics of users, the usage and predictors of ISG usage and if and how these change over time.

aimThis study evaluated the attributes of a publically accessible ISG for depression and other mental disorders including: (1) the demographic and other characteristics of its users; (2) their patterns of usage; and (3) the factors which predict posts to and retention on the ISG.

methodUser characteristics (gender, age, user type, country and location of residence) were collected at the time of registration on the ISG BlueBoard (blueboard.anu.edu.au). All board log data were downloaded for the period October 2008 to May 2014. Predictors of post frequency and retention on the board were examined using logistic regressions. Other data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

results2932 users contributed 131,004 posts to the ISG. The majority were female, aged 20 to 34 years, and mental health consumers. Although most users were city dwellers, 19% resided in rural or remote regions. Frequency of posts and retention on the board varied across users, with a moderate association between retention and number of posts. Growth in posts substantially exceeded the growth in new users over the monitoring period. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that consumers posted more often and remained longer than carers or others, and that younger users posted less often; however, the model predicted very little of the variance.

conclusionsA small minority of active users are sufficient to ensure the sustainability and growth of an online mental health ISG. Further research is required to understand why so many support group members limit their contributions to one or a very small number of posts and what factors predict and promote active engagement and long-term retention in virtual mental health communities.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionInternetMental healthSupport groupVirtual community

Identifiers

PMID30135821
PMCPMC6096300
OpenAlexW2559621421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.