Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135771›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2018

Comparing usage of a web and app stress management intervention: An observational study.

Leanne G Morrison, Adam W A Geraghty, Scott Lloyd, Natalie Goodman, Danius T Michaelides, Charlie Hargood, Mark Weal, Lucy Yardley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leanne G MorrisonDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social, Human, and Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Adam W A GeraghtyPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Scott LloydRedcar & Cleveland Borough Council, Redcar, Yorkshire, UK.
Natalie GoodmanGateshead Council, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Danius T MichaelidesElectronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Charlie HargoodElectronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Mark WealElectronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Lucy YardleyDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social, Human, and Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choices in the design and delivery of digital health behaviour interventions may have a direct influence on subsequent usage and engagement. Few studies have been able to make direct, detailed comparisons of differences in usage between interventions that are delivered via web or app. This study compared the usage of two versions of a digital stress management intervention, one delivered via a website (Healthy Paths) and the other delivered via an app (Healthy Mind). Design modifications were introduced within Healthy Mind to take account of reported differences in how individuals engage with websites compared to apps and mobile phones. Data were collected as part of an observational study nested within a broader exploratory trial of Healthy Mind. Objective usage of Healthy Paths and Healthy Mind were automatically recorded, including frequency and duration of logins, access to specific components within the intervention and order of page/screen visits. Usage was compared for a two week period following initial registration. In total, 381 participants completed the registration process for Healthy Paths (web) and 162 participants completed the registration process for Healthy Mind (app). App users logged in twice as often ( TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN67177737.

Indexed as

Behavioural researchData analysisHealthInternetMobile applicationsUsage

Identifiers

PMID30135771
PMCPMC6096327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.