ArticleInternet interventions2017
Can Amazon's Mechanical Turk be used to recruit participants for internet intervention trials? A pilot study involving a randomized controlled trial of a brief online intervention for hazardous alcohol use.
Article in Internet interventions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increasing treatment-seeking intentions of US veterans in the Covid-19 era: A randomized controlled trial.Depression and anxiety · 2021Trial
- Reducing Stigma Toward Individuals With Schizophrenia Using a Brief Video: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Young Adults.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2021Trial
- Effectiveness of a Video-Based Intervention on Reducing Perceptions of Fear, Loneliness, and Public Stigma Related to COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of public health · 2021Trial
- Article
- Crowd-sourced investigation of a potential relationship betweenFrontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- The effectiveness of a web-based intervention for Japanese adults with problem drinking: An online randomized controlled trial.Addictive behaviors reports · 2022Article
- Randomized controlled trial of online interventions for co-occurring depression and hazardous alcohol consumption: Primary outcome results.Internet interventions · 2021Article
- Psychiatric symptoms and moral injury among US healthcare workers in the COVID-19 era.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- A Digital Health Tool to Understand and Prevent Cannabis-Impaired Driving Among Youth: A Cross-sectional Study of Responses to a Brief Intervention for Cannabis Use.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2020Article
- Online interventions for problem gamblers with and without co-occurring unhealthy alcohol use: Randomized controlled trial.Internet interventions · 2020Article
- How one small text change in a study document can impact recruitment rates and follow-up completions.Internet interventions · 2019Article
- Outcomes of two randomized controlled trials, employing participants recruited through Mechanical Turk, of Internet interventions targeting unhealthy alcohol use.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- Pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention for problem gamblers.Addictive behaviors reports · 2019Article
- Article
- Comparing Amazon Mechanical Turk with unpaid internet resources in online clinical trials.Internet interventions · 2018Article
- Using Mechanical Turk to recruit participants for internet intervention research: experience from recruitment for four trials targeting hazardous alcohol consumption.BMC medical research methodology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine whether Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) might be a viable means of recruiting participants for online intervention research. This was accomplished by conducting a randomized controlled trial of a previously validated intervention with participants recruited through MTurk.
methodsParticipants were recruited to complete an online survey about their alcohol use through the MTurk platform. Those who met eligibility criterion for age and problem drinking were invited to complete a 3-month follow-up. Those who agreed were randomized to receive access to an online brief intervention for drinking or were assigned to a no intervention control group (i.e., thanked and told that they would be re-contacted in 3 months).
resultsA total of 423 participants were recruited, of which 85% were followed-up at 3-months. All participants were recruited in 3.2 h. Only 1/3 of participants asked to access the online brief intervention did so. Of the 4 outcome variables (number of drinks in a typical week, highest number on one occasion, number of consequences, AUDIT consumption subscale), one displayed a significant difference between conditions. Participants in the intervention group reported a greater reduction between on the AUDIT consumption subscale between baseline and 3-month follow-up compared to those in the no intervention control group (
conclusionsDespite the current pilot showing only limited evidence of impact of the intervention among participants recruited through MTurk, there is potential for conducting trials employing this population (particularly if methods are employed to make sure that participants receive the intervention). This potential is important as it could allow for the rapid conduct of multiple trials during the development stages of online interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.