ArticleF1000Research
Article in F1000Research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Construction of Heterothallic Strains ofBiomolecules · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Genome-Based Average Nucleotide Identity Calculation for Identification of Twelve Yeast Species.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characteristics of Corynespora cassiicola, the causal agent of tobacco Corynespora leaf spot, revealed by genomic and metabolic phenomic analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A practical comparison of the next-generation sequencing platform and assemblers using yeast genome.Life science alliance · 2023Article
- Yeasts Inhabiting Extreme Environments and Their Biotechnological Applications.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Applications and potentials of nanopore sequencing in the (epi)genome and (epi)transcriptome era.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2021Review
- Shotgun metagenome data of a defined mock community using Oxford Nanopore, PacBio and Illumina technologies.Scientific data · 2019Article
- Nanopore sequencing enables near-complete de novo assembly of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reference strain CEN.PK113-7D.FEMS yeast research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.