Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135679›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2018

An Explorative Note on Apraxia Tests.

Philipp Gulde, Katharina Leippold, Alan Armstrong, Sarah Kohl, Timo Grimmer, Janine Diehl-Schmid, Joachim Hermsdörfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Characterising factors underlying praxis deficits in chronic left hemisphere stroke patients.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philipp GuldeChair of Human Movement Science, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katharina LeippoldChair of Human Movement Science, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alan ArmstrongChair of Human Movement Science, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sarah KohlDepartment of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Timo GrimmerDepartment of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Janine Diehl-SchmidDepartment of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Joachim HermsdörferChair of Human Movement Science, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apraxia is stated independent of primary motor disorders. However, patient groups suffering from stroke or dementia can reveal motor impairments. In this study we examined the dependence of apraxia tests of imitation and pantomime on a latent motor component using a principal component analysis. With samples sizes of 11 patients suffering from dementia of the Alzheimer's type and 15 healthy control subjects, clear limitations concerning the validity of the results are given. Nevertheless, we could observe strong dependence of the three apraxia tests, especially the imitation of finger and hand gestures, on a latent motor component in this preliminary examination. We suggest confirmation by larger samples sizes and to control for the basic motor capacity when testing for signs of apraxia in such patient samples.

Indexed as

apraxiadementiaimitationmotor capacityprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID30135679
PMCPMC6092500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.