Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135575›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2018

Alternative splicing in prostate cancer.

Alec Paschalis, Adam Sharp, Jonathan C Welti, Antje Neeb, Ganesh V Raj, Jun Luo, Stephen R Plymate, Johann S de Bono

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Prostate Cancer: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Serican journal of medicine · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alec PaschalisThe Institute for Cancer Research, London, UK.
Adam SharpThe Institute for Cancer Research, London, UK.
Jonathan C WeltiThe Institute for Cancer Research, London, UK.
Antje NeebThe Institute for Cancer Research, London, UK.
Ganesh V RajDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jun LuoDepartment of Urology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stephen R PlymateDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and VAPSHCS-GRECC, Seattle, WA, USA.
Johann S de BonoThe Institute for Cancer Research, London, UK. Johann.de-Bono@icr.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-595X
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBJohns Hopkins University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Targeting the Metabolome in Androgen Receptor-driven Castration-resistant Prostate CancerI01BX003324 · VA · VA PUGET SOUND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI PLYMATE, STEPHEN R. · 2016 to 2024
–
BLRD VA I01 BX003324Medical Research Council MR/M018318/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Androgen receptor (AR) splice variants (AR-Vs) have been implicated in the development and progression of metastatic prostate cancer. AR-Vs are truncated isoforms of the AR, a subset of which lack a ligand-binding domain and remain constitutively active in the absence of circulating androgens, thus promoting cancer cell proliferation. Consequently, AR-Vs have been proposed to contribute not only to resistance to anti-androgen therapies but also to resistance to radiotherapy in patients receiving combination therapy by promoting DNA repair. AR-Vs, such as AR-V7, have been associated with unfavourable clinical outcomes in patients; however, attempts to specifically inhibit or prevent the formation of AR-Vs have, to date, been unsuccessful. Thus, novel therapeutic strategies are desperately needed to address the oncogenic effects of AR-Vs, which can drive lethal forms of prostate cancer. Disruption of alternative splicing through modulation of the spliceosome is one such potential therapeutic avenue; however, our understanding of the biology of the spliceosome and how it contributes to prostate cancer remains incomplete, as reflected in the dearth of spliceosome-targeted therapeutic agents. In this Review, the authors outline the current understanding of the role of the spliceosome in the progression of prostate cancer and explore the therapeutic utility of manipulating alternative splicing to improve patient care.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingCarcinogenesisCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionDNA RepairHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisProstatic NeoplasmsProtein IsoformsReceptors, AndrogenSpliceosomesProtein IsoformsReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID30135575
OpenAlexW2888253244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.