ArticleScientific reports2018
Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Bifurcated Stent Grafts with Various Torsion Angles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Type IIIb Endoleaks: A Literature Review to Identify Possible Physical Mechanisms and Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Impact of Cross-Limb Stent-Graft Configuration on Hemodynamics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Interventional Therapy.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
- Evaluating Short-Term and Long-Term Risks Associated with Renal Artery Stenosis Position and Severity: A Hemodynamic Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparative evaluation of ballet-type and conventional stent graft configurations for endovascular aneurysm repair: A CFD analysis.Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The "crossed limbs" strategy for bifurcated stent grafts (BSGs) is widely employed when abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients have unfavorable neck or highly splayed iliac arteries. Helical flow is regarded as a typical flow pattern within the human arterial system and is believed to have the positive physiological effects of inhibiting thrombosis formation and atherosclerosis. The "crossed limbs" strategy may induce helical flow and improve the stent graft outcome. To verify the performance of this strategy by considering hemodynamics, we constructed a series of idealized BSGs with various torsion angles and evaluated the hemodynamic performance, including the helical strength, time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index, relative resident time (RRT), and displacement force. Our numerical results indicate that an increased torsion angle enhances the helicity strength at the iliac outlets. However, with increasing torsion angle, the TAWSS in the iliac graft decreases and the RRT increases. In addition, our numerical simulations and in vitro experiments reveal that the displacement force increases gradually with increasing torsion angle. In summary, the "crossed limbs" strategy may have benefits for AAA treatment in terms of helical flow, but because of the unfavorable hemodynamic performance verified by analyzing the hemodynamic indicators, the risk of stent graft migration increases with increasing torsion angle. Therefore, the "crossed limbs" strategy should be carefully employed in surgical AAA treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.