ArticleScientific reports2018
Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR for the evaluation of aggressive characteristics of rectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Cannot Predict Histopathological Features and Response to Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer MRI from theory to practice.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging and conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging for determining cervical cancer image quality, lymphovascular space invasion, and lymph node metastasis status: a comparative study.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
- Article
- Application value of simultaneous multislice readout-segmented echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiation of rectal cancer grade.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Read-out Segmented Echo Planar Imaging with Two-Dimensional Navigator Correction (RESOLVE): An Alternative Sequence to Improve Image Quality on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate whether aggressive characteristics of rectal cancer can be predicted by the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance. We enrolled one hundred and fifteen patients. The image quality of ADC maps by rs-EPI was compared with that by traditional single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI), and ADC measurement was performed on the rs-EPI based ADC maps. Differences in ADC values of tumors grouped according to differentiation grade, clinical T stage and plasmatic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level were tested. The correlation between each aggressive characteristic and the corresponding ADC values was evaluated. The image quality of ADC maps obtained by rs-EPI was superior toss-EPI (P < 0.05). The ADC values of tumor were categorized based on the following differentiation grades: poor (0.89 ± 0.12 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.