ArticleScientific reports2018
Risk factors associated with extracranial atherosclerosis in old patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of recurrence of ischemic stroke within 1 year of discharge based on machine learning MRI radiomics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Effect of electroacupuncture on glial fibrillary acidic protein and nerve growth factor in the hippocampus of rats with hyperlipidemia and middle cerebral artery thrombus.Neural regeneration research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with extracranial atherosclerosis (ECAS) in old Chinese patients with ischemic stroke. Eligible patients were divided into two groups: <60years group and ≥60 years group. The incidence, severity of ECAS and risk factors related to ECAS were compared between the two groups. In total, 921 patients were included in the analysis. The distribution of ECAS between the two age groups did not show difference (P = 0.747).But severe ECAS stenosis was more common in <60years group than in ≥60years group (x
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.