The Future of Health Is Self-Production and Co-Creation Based on Apomediative Decision Support.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. User-Centered Design of a Digitally Enabled Care Pathway in a Large Health System: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2023
   Article
2. Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2022
   Article
3. The Rise of the Empowered Physician in the Digital Health Era: Viewpoint.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019
   Article
4. From Rapid Recommendation to Online Preference-Sensitive Decision Support: The Case of Severe Aortic Stenosis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
   Article
5. From Apomediation to AImediation: Generative AI and the Reconfiguration of Informational Authority in Health Communication.Journal of primary care & community health
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as