Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135234›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2018

Are

Twisha S Patel, Peggy L Carver, Gregory A Eschenauer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. New Data on theAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Twisha S PatelMichigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Peggy L CarverMichigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA peg@umich.edu.
Gregory A EschenauerMichigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to critically analyze published data evaluating the impact of azole pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, MICs, and

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsAzolesCandidaCandidemiaFluconazoleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSpecies SpecificityTreatment OutcomeAntifungal AgentsAzolesFluconazoleantifungalazoleCandidaclinical breakpointsoutcomespharmacodynamicspharmacokineticssusceptibility testing

Identifiers

PMID30135234
PMCPMC6258862
OpenAlexW2888221063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.