Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135153›Full record

SynthesisProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Australian native mammals recognize and respond to alien predators: a meta-analysis.

Peter B Banks, Alexandra J R Carthey, Jenna P Bytheway

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Global determinants of prey naiveté to exotic predators.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. In situ predator conditioning of naive prey prior to reintroduction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter B BanksSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia peter.banks@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4340-6495
Alexandra J R CartheySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0472-2217
Jenna P BythewaySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4033-9538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prey naiveté is a failure to recognize novel predators and thought to cause exaggerated impacts of alien predators on native wildlife. Yet there is equivocal evidence in the literature for native prey naiveté towards aliens. To address this, we conducted a meta-analysis of Australian mammal responses to native and alien predators. Australia has the world's worst record of extinction and declines of native mammals, largely owing to two alien predators introduced more than 150 years ago: the feral cat,

Indexed as

Food ChainPredatory BehaviorRecognition, PsychologyAnimalsAustraliaCatsCuesFoxesMacropodidaeMarsupialiaPhylogenyTrichosurusalien speciesferal catmeta-analysispredator recognitionprey naivetéred fox

Identifiers

PMID30135153
PMCPMC6125917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.