Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135090›Full record

ArticleGenome research2018

Phenotypically distinct female castes in honey bees are defined by alternative chromatin states during larval development.

Marek Wojciechowski, Robert Lowe, Joanna Maleszka, Danyal Conn, Ryszard Maleszka, Paul J Hurd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pervasive relaxed selection in termite genomes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Roles of DNA Methylation in Color Alternation of Eastern Honey Bees (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marek Wojciechowski *School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8935-3640
Robert Lowe *The Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0473-3247
Joanna MaleszkaResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
Danyal ConnSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4232-9344
Ryszard MaleszkaResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1855-555X
Paul J HurdSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1112-9347

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L023164/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity of the honey bee to produce three phenotypically distinct organisms (two female castes; queens and sterile workers, and haploid male drones) from one genotype represents one of the most remarkable examples of developmental plasticity in any phylum. The queen-worker morphological and reproductive divide is environmentally controlled during post-embryonic development by differential feeding. Previous studies implicated metabolic flux acting via epigenetic regulation, in particular DNA methylation and microRNAs, in establishing distinct patterns of gene expression underlying caste-specific developmental trajectories. We produce the first genome-wide maps of chromatin structure in the honey bee at a key larval stage in which developmental canalization into queen or worker is virtually irreversible. We find extensive genome-wide differences in H3K4me3, H3K27ac, and H3K36me3, many of which correlate with caste-specific transcription. Furthermore, we identify H3K27ac as a key chromatin modification, with caste-specific regions of intronic H3K27ac directing the worker caste. These regions may harbor the first examples of caste-specific enhancer elements in the honey bee. Our results demonstrate a key role for chromatin modifications in the establishment and maintenance of caste-specific transcriptional programs in the honey bee. We show that at 96 h of larval growth, the queen-specific chromatin pattern is already established, whereas the worker determination is not, thus providing experimental support for the perceived timing of this critical point in developmental heterochrony in two types of honey bee females. In a broader context, our study provides novel data on environmentally regulated organismal plasticity and the molecular foundation of the evolutionary origins of eusociality.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsBeesChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyChromatin ImmunoprecipitationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenotypeHistonesInsect ProteinsLarvaMalePhenotypeSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNAChromatinHistonesInsect Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30135090
PMCPMC6169885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.