Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135080›Full record

ArticleBiology open2018

Bees with attitude: the effects of directed gusts on flight trajectories.

Timothy Jakobi, Dmitry Kolomenskiy, Teruaki Ikeda, Simon Watkins, Alex Fisher, Hao Liu, Sridhar Ravi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A wind-tunnel gust generator for soaring birds and small UAVs.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timothy JakobiSchool of Aerospace Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, 3083, Australia tim@timjakobi.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4176-8836
Dmitry KolomenskiyJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama-shi, 236-0001, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-6894
Teruaki IkedaGraduate School of Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba-shi, 263-8522, Japan.
Simon WatkinsSchool of Aerospace Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, 3083, Australia.
Alex FisherSchool of Aerospace Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, 3083, Australia.
Hao LiuGraduate School of Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba-shi, 263-8522, Japan.
Sridhar RaviSchool of Aerospace Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, 3083, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flight is a complicated task at the centimetre scale particularly due to unsteady air fluctuations which are ubiquitous in outdoor flight environments. Flying organisms deal with these difficulties using active and passive control mechanisms to steer their body motion. Body attitudes of flapping organisms are linked with their resultant flight trajectories and performance, yet little is understood about how isolated unsteady aerodynamic phenomena affect the interlaced dynamics of such systems. In this study, we examined freely flying bumblebees subject to a single isolated gust to emulate aerodynamic disturbances encountered in nature. Bumblebees are expert commanders of the aerial domain as they persistently forage within complex terrain elements. By tracking the three-dimensional dynamics of bees flying through gusts, we determined the sequences of motion that permit flight in three disturbance conditions: sideward, upward and downward gusts. Bees executed a series of passive impulsive maneuvers followed by active recovery maneuvers. Impulsive motion was unique in each gust direction, maintaining control by passive manipulation of the body. Bees pitched up and slowed down at the beginning of recovery in every disturbance, followed by corrective maneuvers which brought body attitudes back to their original state. Bees were displaced the most by the sideward gust, displaying large lateral translations and roll deviations. Upward gusts were easier for bees to fly through, causing only minor flight changes and minimal recovery times. Downward gusts severely impaired the control response of bees, inflicting strong adverse forces which sharply upset trajectories. Bees used a variety of control strategies when flying in each disturbance, offering new insights into insect-scale flapping flight and bio-inspired robotic systems.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Indexed as

Flapping flightFlight controlGustsInsect body dynamics

Identifiers

PMID30135080
PMCPMC6215418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.