Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30135050›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Veterans' Attitudes Toward Smartphone App Use for Mental Health Care: Qualitative Study of Rurality and Age Differences.

Samantha L Connolly, Christopher J Miller, Christopher J Koenig, Kara A Zamora, Patricia B Wright, Regina L Stanley, Jeffrey M Pyne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of mhealth applications on military personnel's physical and mental health: A systematic review.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bridging Rural America's Digital Divide in Health Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rural and urban differences in perceptions, behaviors, and health care disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha L ConnollyCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-5626
Christopher J MillerCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8695-6833
Christopher J KoenigSan Francisco VA Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0884-4120
Kara A ZamoraSan Francisco VA Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6566-3302
Patricia B WrightUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1651-6899
Regina L StanleyCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2593-9711
Jeffrey M PyneUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9501-6053
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · USHarvard University · USSan Francisco VA Health Care System · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

HSRD VA CRE 12-300HSRD VA I01 HX001114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health smartphone apps provide support, skills, and symptom tracking on demand and come at minimal to no additional cost to patients. Although the Department of Veterans Affairs has established itself as a national leader in the creation of mental health apps, veterans' attitudes regarding the use of these innovations are largely unknown, particularly among rural and aging populations who may benefit from increased access to care.

objectiveThe objective of our study was to examine veterans' attitudes toward smartphone apps and to assess whether openness toward this technology varies by age or rurality.

methodsWe conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with 66 veterans from rural and urban areas in Maine, Arkansas, and California. Eligible veterans aged 18 to 70 years had screened positive for postraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), alcohol use disorder, or major depressive disorder, but a history of mental health service utilization was not required. Interviews were digitally recorded, professionally transcribed, and coded by a research team using an established codebook. We then conducted a thematic analysis of segments pertaining to smartphone use, informed by existing theories of technology adoption.

resultsInterviews revealed a marked division regarding openness to mental health smartphone apps, such that veterans either expressed strongly positive or negative views about their usage, with few participants sharing ambivalent or neutral opinions. Differences emerged between rural and urban veterans' attitudes, with rural veterans tending to oppose app usage, describe smartphones as hard to navigate, and cite barriers such as financial limitations and connectivity issues, more so than urban populations. Moreover, rural veterans more often described smartphones as being opposed to their values. Differences did not emerge between younger and older (≥50) veterans regarding beliefs that apps could be effective or compatible with their culture and identity. However, compared with younger veterans, older veterans more often reported not owning a smartphone and described this technology as being difficult to use.

conclusionsOpenness toward the use of smartphone apps in mental health treatment may vary based on rurality, and further exploration of the barriers cited by rural veterans is needed to improve access to care. In addition, findings indicate that older patients may be more open to integrating technology into their mental health care than providers might assume, although such patients may have more trouble navigating these devices and may benefit from simplified app designs or smartphone training. Given the strong opinions expressed either for or against smartphone apps, our findings suggest that apps may not be an ideal adjunctive treatment for all patients, but it is important to identify those who are open to and may greatly benefit from this technology.

Indexed as

agealcohol abuseanxiety disordersdepressionmental healthmhealthmobile phoneposttraumatic stress disorderPTSDqualitative analysisruralitysmartphone appsveterans

Identifiers

PMID30135050
PMCPMC6125614
OpenAlexW2883585614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.