ArticleBMC health services research2018
Characteristics of undiagnosed diseases network applicants: implications for referring providers.
Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02450851 (Clinical and Genetic Evaluation of Patients With Undiagnosed Disorders Through the Undiagnosed Diseases Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Genetic Evaluation of Patients With Undiagnosed Disorders Through the Undiagnosed Diseases Network
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Demographic Characteristics Associated With Perceptions of Personal Utility in Genetic and Genomic Testing: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- "It didn't feel like anything unusual because we had already been through so much": Disability-related research experiences of families with children enrolled in the undiagnosed diseases network.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- Clinical Utility of Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing in Hospitalized Adults With Unexplained Neurologic Presentations.Neurology · 2026Article
- Equity-focused implementation to enhance access to rare disease genomic research and understand diverse perspectives.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- Referral route: a determinant of inequity for children with undiagnosed genetic diseases?Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Breaking barriers: fostering equitable access to pediatric genomics through innovative care models and technologies.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- The Brain Gene Registry: a data snapshot.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2024Article
- International Undiagnosed Diseases Programs (UDPs): components and outcomes.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Review
- Genomics Research with Undiagnosed Children: Ethical Challenges at the Boundaries of Research and Clinical Care.The Journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Advancing Understanding of Inequities in Rare Disease Genomics.Clinical therapeutics · 2023Article
- Rare diseases, common barriers: disparities in pediatric clinical genetics outcomes.Pediatric research · 2023Article
- Geographic Influence Upon Noninfectious Diseases Accounting for Fever of Unknown Origin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Beyond race: Recruitment of diverse participants in clinical genomics research for rare disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Congenital anomalies and genetic disorders in neonates and infants: a single-center observational cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Observational
- Patients as Partners in Rare Disease Diagnosis and Research.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2021Review
- Machine Learning of Patient Characteristics to Predict Admission Outcomes in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- The influence of social determinants of health on the genetic diagnostic odyssey: who remains undiagnosed, why, and to what effect?Pediatric research · 2021Review
- The undiagnosed diseases program: Approach to diagnosis.Translational science of rare diseases · 2020Article
- Epigenetic Inheritance Underlying Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2019Review
- Toward representative genomic research: the children's rare disease cohorts experience.Therapeutic advances in rare diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of undiagnosed diseases manifest with objective findings that warrant further investigation. The Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) receives applications from patients whose symptoms and signs have been intractable to diagnosis; however, many UDN applicants are affected primarily by subjective symptoms such as pain and fatigue. We sought to characterize presenting symptoms, referral sources, and demographic factors of applicants to the UDN to identify factors that may determine application outcome and potentially differentiate between those with undiagnosed diseases (with more objective findings) and those who are less likely to have an undiagnosed disease (more subjective symptoms).
methodsWe used a systematic retrospective review of 151 consecutive Not Accepted and 50 randomly selected Accepted UDN applications. The primary outcome was whether an applicant was Accepted, or Not Accepted, and, if accepted, whether or not a diagnosis was made. Objective and subjective symptoms and information on prior specialty consultations were collected from provider referral letters. Demographic data and decision data on network acceptance were gathered from the UDN online portal.
resultsFewer objective findings and more subjective symptoms were found in the Not Accepted applications. Not Accepted referrals also were from older individuals, reported a shorter period of illness, and were referred to the UDN by their primary care physicians. All of these differences reached statistical significance in comparison with Accepted applications. The frequency of subspecialty consults for diagnostic purposes prior to UDN application was similar in both groups.
conclusionsThe preponderance of subjective and lack of objective findings in the Not Accepted applications distinguish these from applicants that are accepted for evaluation and diagnostic efforts through the UDN. Not Accepted applicants are referred primarily by their primary care providers after multiple specialist consultations fail to yield answers. Distinguishing between patients with undiagnosed diseases with objective findings and those with primarily subjective findings can delineate patients who would benefit from further diagnostic processes from those who may have functional disorders and need alternative pathways for management of their symptoms.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT02450851 , posted May 21st 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.