Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30134943›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2018

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale with school-based behavioral health consultants.

Clayton R Cook, Chayna Davis, Eric C Brown, Jill Locke, Mark G Ehrhart, Gregory A Aarons, Madeline Larson, Aaron R Lyon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Clayton R CookUniversity of Minnesota, 341 Education Sciences Bldg, 56 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. crcook@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0877-939X
Chayna DavisUniversity of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Eric C BrownDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th Street, Office 104, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Jill LockeUniversity of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Mark G EhrhartUniversity of Central Florida, 4111 Pictor Lane, Orlando, FL, 32816-1390, USA.
Gregory A AaronsUniversity of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive (0812), La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Madeline LarsonUniversity of Minnesota, 341 Education Sciences Bldg, 56 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Aaron R LyonUniversity of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.

Funding

Implementation of a Measurement Feedback System in School Mental HealthK08MH095939 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LYON, AARON ROBERT · 2012 to 2016
$787k
Staff and School Factors Affecting Implementation of ASD Interventions in SchoolsK01MH100199 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LOCKE, JILL J · 2014 to 2017
$698k
Institute of Educational Sciences R305A160114NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH100199NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH095939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) is a widely used tool, but it has not been adapted and validated for use in schools, the most common setting where youth access behavioral health services. This study examined the factor structure, psychometric properties, and criterion-related validity of the school-adapted EBPAS in a sample of school-based behavioral health consultants.

methodA research team comprised of experts in implementation of evidence-based practices in schools along with the original developer adapted the EBPAS for the school setting. The adapted instrument was administered to a representative sample (n = 196) of school-based behavioral health consultants to assess the reliability and structural validity via a series of confirmatory factor analyses.

resultsThe original EBPAS factor structure was confirmed, with the final model supporting four first-order factors that load onto a second-order factor capturing general attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Correlations among the subscales indicated both unique and shared variance. Correlations between EBPAS scores and consultant variables demonstrated differential criterion-related validity, with the total score and the Requirements and Openness subscales demonstrating the strongest correlations.

conclusionsThe adapted EBPAS performed well when administered to behavioral health consultants operating in the educator sector, supporting the relevance of assessing attitudes in school settings. Potential directions for future research and applications of the EBPAS in schools and other service sectors are discussed.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelConsultantsDelivery of Health CareEvidence-Based PracticeAdolescentFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesPractice Patterns, Physicians'PsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudesConfirmatory factor analysisEducation sectorEvidence-based practiceEvidence-Based Practice Attitudes ScaleImplementationReliabilityStructural validity

Identifiers

PMID30134943
PMCPMC6106841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.