Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30134887›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Lost in transition? Professional perspectives on transitional mental health services for young people in Germany: a qualitative study.

Sabine Loos, Naina Walia, Thomas Becker, Bernd Puschner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sabine LoosSection Process-Outcome Research, Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2, D-89312, Günzburg, Germany. sabine.loos@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2893-1590
Naina WaliaSection Process-Outcome Research, Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2, D-89312, Günzburg, Germany.
Thomas BeckerSection Process-Outcome Research, Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2, D-89312, Günzburg, Germany.
Bernd PuschnerSection Process-Outcome Research, Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2, D-89312, Günzburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft LO 2164/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition of young patients from child and adolescent to adult mental health services often results in the interruption or termination of care. At this intersection, mental health professionals function as gatekeepers between systems, and their personal views on current clinical practice can contribute to a broader understanding of procedures and help identify reasons for service gaps. This qualitative study investigated the views of mental health professionals on services for young people during the transition from child and adolescent to adult mental health care, as well as on factors which facilitate or hinder continuity of care.

methodsFour group discussions with 24 mental health professionals with various backgrounds were conducted. Groups were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed following the reconstructive approach of R. Bohnsack's documentary method.

resultsA main theme and six subthemes emerged. Participants' overall concern was an increasing lack of patient centeredness in care provision. They criticized the limited flexibility and time constraints of their work, which was held to be incompatible with the time-consuming process of engaging young patients in care and coping with their individual needs. A lack of adequate interprofessional exchange and networking was seen as resulting in a diffuse sense of responsibility and a lack of clarity for all involved parties. Participants focused on the adverse impact of neglecting developmental characteristics in care procedures for young patients and revealed personal issues they experienced in their work with young patients (e. g. personal difficulties with diagnosing).

conclusionsMental health professionals at this transitional point face a number of complex tasks as well as limitations in terms of time and personal support. An emphasis should be placed on forming and maintaining partnerships within and between systems which could contribute significantly to relieving professionals' workload. Furthermore, an open style of communication to engage young patients in care is essential. Strengthening communicative skills, improving knowledge about this life stage (especially when working in adult services), and promoting interprofessional encounters can help to develop new procedures in clinical practice. On higher system levels, heightened awareness of the need to reduce fragmentation of care and administrative barriers is needed.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelTransition to Adult CareAdolescentAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationContinuity of Patient CareFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMental Health ServicesPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchYoung AdultAdolescentsGroup discussionsMental health servicesProfessionalsQualitative researchTransitionYoung people

Identifiers

PMID30134887
PMCPMC6104012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.