Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30134756›Full record

ArticleThe journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians2019

Criteria for assigning cause of death for stillbirths and neonatal deaths in research studies in low-middle income countries.

Robert L Goldenberg, Lulu Muhe, Sarah Saleem, Sangappa Dhaded, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Janna Patterson, Assaye Nigussie, Elizabeth M McClure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Factors Associated With Parental Acceptance of Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling to Identify the Causes of Stillbirth and Neonatal Death.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert L Goldenberga Columbia University , New York , NY , USA.
Lulu Muheb Addis Ababa University , Addis Ababa , Ethiopia.
Sarah Saleemc Department of Community Health Sciences , Aga Khan University , Karachi , Pakistan.
Sangappa Dhadedd KLE'S University JN Medical College , Belagavi , India.
Shivaprasad S Goudard KLE'S University JN Medical College , Belagavi , India.
Janna Pattersone Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation , Seattle , Washington , USA.
Assaye Nigussiee Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation , Seattle , Washington , USA.
Elizabeth M McCluref RTI International , Durham , NC , USA.

Funding

Columbia University/Aga Khan University Global Network Research UnitU10HD078438 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDENBERG, ROBERT L · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD078438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate knowledge regarding cause of death (COD) for stillbirths and neonatal deaths is crucial, especially in low-income countries, in order for public health and medical officials to choose appropriate interventions likely to reduce these deaths. To date, many of the COD studies in these areas have relied only on obstetric or neonatal clinical information and the determination of COD is likely to be inaccurate. Information related to infectious COD is especially lacking. Thus, without more sophisticated testing, data as currently collected only provide a very weak approximation of the COD and may well lead to adoption of interventions of limited usefulness. In this commentary, we propose recommendations regarding the type of data needed to determine with reasonable accuracy the COD for stillbirths and neonatal deaths in low-resource settings. Using these data, and a method to determine the degree of certainty, we then propose definitions for the most common COD. Our goal is to reduce subjectivity and provide more specificity for the tests used in existing classification systems so that the methodology of COD determination is transparent and able to be replicated over time and from location to location.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathDeveloping CountriesPerinatal DeathStillbirthAutopsyHumansInfant, Newbornautopsycause of deathlow/middle-income countriesminimum invasive tissue samplingNeonatal mortalitystillbirth

Identifiers

PMID30134756
PMCPMC6410364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.