Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30134523›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Nanoporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Local Doxorubicin Delivery in Bone Metastases Secondary to Prostate Cancer.

Pouyan Ahangar, Elie Akoury, Ana Sofia Ramirez Garcia Luna, Antone Nour, Michael H Weber, Derek H Rosenzweig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 3D printing in palliative medicine: systematic review.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current and Emerging Approaches for Spine Tumor Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pouyan AhangarDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada. pouyan.ahangar@mail.mcgill.ca.
Elie AkouryDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada. elie.akoury@mail.mcgill.ca.
Ana Sofia Ramirez Garcia LunaDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada. A.Ramirez@stud.uni-heidelberg.de.
Antone NourDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada. antone.nour@mail.mcgill.ca.
Michael H WeberDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada. michael.weber@hotmail.com.
Derek H RosenzweigDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada. derek.rosenzweig@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6593-8177
McGill University · CAHeidelberg University · DEMcGill University Health Centre · CAMontreal General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spine is the most common site of bone metastasis, often originating from prostate, lung, and breast cancers. High systemic doses of chemotherapeutics such as doxorubicin (DOX), cisplatin, or paclitaxel often have severe side effects. Surgical removal of spine metastases also leaves large defects which cannot spontaneously heal and require bone grafting. To circumvent these issues, we designed an approach for local chemotherapeutic delivery within 3D-printed scaffolds which could also potentially serve as a bone substitute. Direct treatment of prostate cancer cell line LAPC4 and patient derived spine metastases cells with 0.01 µM DOX significantly reduced metabolic activity, proliferation, migration, and spheroid growth. We then assessed uptake and release of DOX in a series of porous 3D-printed scaffolds on LAPC4 cells as well as patient-derived spine metastases cells. Over seven days, 60⁻75% of DOX loaded onto scaffolds could be released, which significantly reduced metabolic activity and proliferation of both LAPC4 and patient derived cells, while unloaded scaffolds had no effect. Porous 3D-printed scaffolds may provide a novel and inexpensive approach to locally deliver chemotherapeutics in a patient-specific manner at tumor resection sites. With a composite design to enhance strength and promote sustained drug release, the scaffolds could reduce systemic negative effects, enhance bone repair, and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

bone metastasesbone substitutedoxorubicinlocal deliverylow-cost 3D printingnanoporous filamentprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID30134523
PMCPMC6165313
OpenAlexW2888373173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.