ArticleCritical care medicine2018
Ultrasound Assessment of the Change in Carotid Corrected Flow Time in Fluid Responsiveness in Undifferentiated Shock.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of acute kidney injury in acute-on-chronic liver failure.Hepatology international · 2024Guideline
- Role of carotid corrected flow time and peak velocity variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2023Pooled it
- Fluid responsiveness-guided individualized strategy for preventing hypotension after spinal anesthesia in cesarean delivery: a randomized trial of prehydration versus norepinephrine preinfusion.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Effect of different targets of goal-directed fluid therapy on intraoperative hypotension and fluid infusion in robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized non-inferiority trial.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Trial
- Comparison of the carotid corrected flow time and tidal volume challenge for assessing fluid responsiveness in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Trial
- The effect of preload on Doppler systolic time in a large emergency department cohort with suspected sepsis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Carotid flow time: a new surrogate for fluid responsiveness?Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Physiologically-Guided Ultrafiltration: A Proposed Ultrasound Framework for Individualized Volume Removal During Hemodialysis.Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Review
- A global consensus on the critical care management of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients: the APASL ACLF Beijing Position Paper.Hepatology international · 2026Article
- Estimating Blood Volume Loss With Wireless, Wearable Ultrasound: A Pilot Investigation.Military medicine · 2026Article
- Carotid corrected flow time as a sensitive indicator for early diagnosis and dynamic monitoring of hemorrhagic shock: A translational study from porcine model to clinical practice.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Article
- The Impact of Passive Leg Raising on Corrected Carotid Flow Time and Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Before and After Fasting: An Ultrasound-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Position-Induced Change in Carotid Corrected Flow Time Predicts Spinal Hypotension in Cesarean Delivery.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Carotid Doppler and IVC metrics for volume and mortality assessment in septic shock.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2025Observational
- Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Point of care ultrasound for monitoring and resuscitation in patients with shock.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Review
- Point-of-Care Ultrasound Use in Hemodynamic Assessment.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Exploring the predictive value of carotid Doppler ultrasound and clinical features for spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension: a prospective observational study.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2025Article
- A framework for flow time measured by Doppler ultrasound.The ultrasound journal · 2025Article
- Evaluation of hemorrhagic shock and fluid resuscitation in pigs using handless Doppler carotid artery ultrasound.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAdequate assessment of fluid responsiveness in shock necessitates correct interpretation of hemodynamic changes induced by preload challenge. This study evaluates the accuracy of point-of-care Doppler ultrasound assessment of the change in carotid corrected flow time induced by a passive leg raise maneuver as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM, Cheetah Medical, Newton Center, MA) system based on a bioreactance method was used.
designProspective, noninterventional study.
settingICU at a large academic center. PATIENTS: Patients with new, undifferentiated shock, and vasopressor requirements despite fluid resuscitation were included. Patients with significant cardiac disease and conditions that precluded adequate passive leg raising were excluded.
interventionsCarotid corrected flow time was measured via ultrasound before and after a passive leg raise maneuver. Predicted fluid responsiveness was defined as greater than 10% increase in stroke volume on noninvasive cardiac output monitoring following passive leg raise. Images and measurements were reanalyzed by a second, blinded physician. The accuracy of change in carotid corrected flow time to predict fluid responsiveness was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsSeventy-seven subjects were enrolled with 54 (70.1%) classified as fluid responders by noninvasive cardiac output monitoring. The average change in carotid corrected flow time after passive leg raise for fluid responders was 14.1 ± 18.7 ms versus -4.0 ± 8 ms for nonresponders (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that change in carotid corrected flow time is an accurate predictor of fluid responsiveness status (area under the curve, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96) and a 7 ms increase in carotid corrected flow time post passive leg raise was shown to have a 97% positive predictive value and 82% accuracy in detecting fluid responsiveness using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring as a reference standard. Mechanical ventilation, respiratory rate, and high positive end-expiratory pressure had no significant impact on test performance. Post hoc blinded evaluation of bedside acquired measurements demonstrated agreement between evaluators.
conclusionsChange in carotid corrected flow time can predict fluid responsiveness status after a passive leg raise maneuver. Using point-of-care ultrasound to assess change in carotid corrected flow time is an acceptable and reproducible method for noninvasive identification of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with undifferentiated shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.