Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30134240›Full record

Trial reportInternational archives of allergy and immunology

Oral Immunotherapy Using Partially Hydrolyzed Formula for Cow's Milk Protein Allergy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Chisato Inuo, Kenichi Tanaka, Satoko Suzuki, Yoichi Nakajima, Kazuo Yamawaki, Ikuya Tsuge, Atsuo Urisu, Yasuto Kondo

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International archives of allergy and immunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Oral Immunotherapy for Children with Cow's Milk Allergy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): A Personalized Medicine.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chisato InuoDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Kenichi TanakaDepartment of Pediatrics, Second Teaching Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Satoko SuzukiDepartment of Pediatrics, Second Teaching Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoichi NakajimaDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Kazuo YamawakiDepartment of Pediatrics, Second Teaching Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Ikuya TsugeDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Atsuo UrisuDepartment of Pediatrics, Second Teaching Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasuto KondoDepartment of Pediatrics, Second Teaching Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Fujita Health University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPartially hydrolyzed cow's milk protein-based formula (pHF) possesses low allergenicity. Here, we investigate the safety and efficacy of oral immunotherapy using pHF for children with cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA).

objectivesA randomized, double-blind, controlled single-center trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pHF oral immunotherapy in children with CMPA.

methodsParticipants were randomized into double-blind pHF-pHF and extensively hydrolyzed cow's milk protein-based formula (eHF)-pHF groups. During this phase, the pHF-pHF group received pHF and the eHF-pHF group received eHF. During the open phase, all participants received pHF. The primary end point was a change in thresholds between baseline and the end of the first phase. Secondary end points were changes in thresholds between baseline and the end of the second phase, and casein-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E, IgG4, and basophil activation.

resultsTwenty-five children, aged 1-9 years, were randomized into pHF-pHF and eHF-pHF groups. The threshold between baseline and the end of the first phase was significantly elevated in the pHF-pHF group (p = 0.048), but not in the eHF-pHF group. The threshold between other phases did not change significantly in either group. There were significant decreases in casein-specific IgE antibody levels between baseline and the second phase in the eHF-pHF group (p = 0.014). No participants suffered systemic allergic reactions requiring adrenaline or systemic corticosteroids after receiving the formulas.

conclusionsThe results of this trial suggest that, in children with CMPA, tolerance to cow's milk might be safely enhanced by intake of pHF, relative to that of eHF.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAllergensAnimalsCaseinsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EImmunotherapyInfantMaleMilk HypersensitivityMilk ProteinsAllergensCaseinsImmunoglobulin EMilk ProteinsCow’s milk protein allergyFood allergyOral immunotherapyPartially hydrolyzed formula

Identifiers

PMID30134240
PMCPMC6262684
OpenAlexW2888102044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.