Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30134069›Full record

ReviewGenesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)2018

Neural crest and the origin of species-specific pattern.

Richard A Schneider

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neural crest cells as a source of microevolutionary variation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Zebrafish crocc2 mutants exhibit divergent craniofacial shape, misregulated variability, and aberrant cartilage morphogenesis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The impact of Drew Noden's work on our understanding of craniofacial musculoskeletal integration.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard A SchneiderDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-1161, San Francisco, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2626-3111
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

TEMPORAL REGULATION OF CRANIAL SKELETOGENESISR01DE016402 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RICHARD A SCHNEIDER · 2004 to 2026
$8.2M
Mechanisms of Secondary Cartilage Induction and Maintenance in the JawR01DE025668 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHNEIDER, RICHARD A · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016402NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE025668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For well over half of the 150 years since the discovery of the neural crest, the special ability of these cells to function as a source of species-specific pattern has been clearly recognized. Initially, this observation arose in association with chimeric transplant experiments among differentially pigmented amphibians, where the neural crest origin for melanocytes had been duly noted. Shortly thereafter, the role of cranial neural crest cells in transmitting species-specific information on size and shape to the pharyngeal arch skeleton as well as in regulating the timing of its differentiation became readily apparent. Since then, what has emerged is a deeper understanding of how the neural crest accomplishes such a presumably difficult mission, and this includes a more complete picture of the molecular and cellular programs whereby neural crest shapes the face of each species. This review covers studies on a broad range of vertebrates and describes neural-crest-mediated mechanisms that endow the craniofacial complex with species-specific pattern. A major focus is on experiments in quail and duck embryos that reveal a hierarchy of cell-autonomous and non-autonomous signaling interactions through which neural crest generates species-specific pattern in the craniofacial integument, skeleton, and musculature. By controlling size and shape throughout the development of these systems, the neural crest underlies the structural and functional integration of the craniofacial complex during evolution.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeakBody PatterningBone and BonesBranchial RegionCell DifferentiationChimeraDucksFaceGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansNeural CrestQuailSkeletonSkullSpecies Specificitycranial neural crestcraniofacial developmentevolutionary-developmental biologyquail-duck chimerasquckspecies-specific patterntissue-interactions

Identifiers

PMID30134069
PMCPMC6108449
OpenAlexW2887885595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.