ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2018
Continuing Challenges in Advancing Preclinical Science in Skeletal Cell-Based Therapies and Tissue Regeneration.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell spatiotemporal analysis reveals cell fates and functions of transplanted mesenchymal stromal cells during bone repair.Stem cell reports · 2022Article
- A Review of Recent Developments in the Molecular Mechanisms of Bone Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Single-cell characterization and metabolic profiling of in vitro cultured human skeletal progenitors with enhanced in vivo bone forming capacity.Stem cells translational medicine · 2020Article
- Histological Criteria that Distinguish Human and Mouse Bone Formed Within a Mouse Skeletal Repair Defect.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-based therapies hold much promise for musculoskeletal medicine; however, this rapidly growing field faces a number of challenges. Few of these therapies have proven clinical benefit, and an insufficient regulatory environment has allowed for widespread clinical implementation without sufficient evidence of efficacy. The technical and biological complexity of cell-based therapies has contributed to difficulties with reproducibility and mechanistic clarity. In order to aid in addressing these challenges, we aim to clarify the key issues in the preclinical cell therapy field, and to provide a conceptual framework for advancing the state of the science. Broadly, these suggestions relate to: (i) delineating cell-therapy types and moving away from "catch-all" terms such as "stem cell" therapies; (ii) clarifying descriptions of cells and their processing; and (iii) increasing the standard of in vivo evaluation of cell-based therapy experiments to determining cell fates. Further, we provide an overview of methods for experimental evaluation, data sharing, and professional society participation that would be instrumental in advancing this field. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.