Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30133485›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A novel method of inducing endogenous pupil oscillations to detect patients with unilateral optic neuritis.

Cedric Lamirel, Suzon Ajasse, Antoine Moulignier, Laurence Salomon, Romain Deschamps, Antoine Gueguen, Catherine Vignal, Isabelle Cochereau, Jean Lorenceau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cedric LamirelDepartement d'ophtalmologie, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6951-8487
Suzon AjasseInstitut de la Vision, UPMC, Inserm-CNRS, Paris, France.
Antoine MoulignierService de neurologie, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Laurence SalomonUnité de recherche clinique, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Romain DeschampsService de neurologie, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Antoine GueguenService de neurologie, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Catherine VignalDepartement d'ophtalmologie, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Isabelle CochereauDepartement d'ophtalmologie, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Jean LorenceauInstitut de la Vision, UPMC, Inserm-CNRS, Paris, France.
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo use and test a new method of inducing endogenously generated pupillary oscillations (POs) in patients with unilateral optic neuritis (ON), to describe a signal analysis approach quantifying pupil activity and to evaluate the extent to which POs permit to discriminate patients from control participants.

methodPupil size was recorded with an eye-tracker and converted in real time to modulate the luminance of a stimulus (a 20° disk) presented in front of participants. With this biofeedback setting, an increasing pupil size transforms into a high luminance, entraining a pupil constriction that in turn decreases the stimulus luminance, and so on, resulting in endogenously generated POs. POs were recorded for 30 seconds in the affected eye, in the fellow eye and in binocular conditions with 22 patients having a history of unilateral ON within a period of 5 years, and with 22 control participants. Different signal analysis methods were used to quantify the power and frequency of POs.

resultsOn average, pupil size oscillated at around 1 Hz. The amplitude of POs appears not to be a reliable marker of ON. In contrast, the frequency of POs was significantly lower, and was more variable over time, in the patients' affected eye, as compared to their fellow eye and to the binocular condition. No such differences were found in control participants. Receiver operating characteristic analyses based on the frequency and the variability of POs to classify patients and control participants gave an area under the curve of 0.82, a sensitivity of 82% (95%CI: 60%-95%) and a specificity of 77% (95%CI: 55%-92%).

conclusionsThe new method used to induce POs allowed characterizing the visual afferent pathway defect in ON patients with encouraging accuracy. The method was fast, easy to use, only requiring that participants look ahead, and allows testing many stimulus parameters (e.g. color, stimulus location, size, etc).

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOptic NeuritisPhotic StimulationPupilReflex, PupillaryROC CurveYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30133485
PMCPMC6104938
OpenAlexW2888652645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.