ArticleCancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals2018
Biodistribution and Internal Radiation Dosimetry of
Article in Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of dosimetry programs (Olinda & IDAC) for evaluation of absorbed dose inEJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Surface-modified nanotherapeutics targeting atherosclerosis.Biomaterials science · 2022Review
- Experimental evaluation of absolute quantification inJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- A Brief History of Nuclear Medicine Physics, Instrumentation, and Data Sciences in Korea.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Review
- Article
- Non-oncological applications of RGD-based single-photon emission tomography and positron emission tomography agents.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Review
- Advances in Development of Radiometal Labeled Amino Acid-Based Compounds for Cancer Imaging and Diagnostics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles drive miR-485-5p inhibition in glioma stem cells by silencing Tie1 expression.International journal of biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntegrin α MATERIALS AND
methodsSix healthy volunteers underwent whole-body simultaneous anterior and posterior scans, preceded by transmission scans using cobalt-57 flood source, with a dual head gamma camera system, at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h postinjection of
resultsHigh radiation doses of renal and biliary excretion tracks such as the urinary bladder wall, upper large intestine, kidneys, liver, and gallbladder wall (19.15 ± 6.84, 19.28 ± 4.78, 15.67 ± 0.90, 9.13 ± 1.71, and 9.09 ± 2.03 μGy/MBq, respectively) were observed. The ED and effective dose equivalent were 5.08 ± 0.53 and 7.11 ± 0.58 μSv/MBq, respectively.
conclusionsDosimetry results were comparable to other radiolabeled peptides and were considered safe and efficient for clinical usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.