Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30132965›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2018

Outcomes of front-line ibrutinib treated CLL patients excluded from landmark clinical trial.

Anthony R Mato, Lindsey E Roeker, John N Allan, John M Pagel, Danielle M Brander, Brian T Hill, Bruce D Cheson, Richard R Furman, Nicole Lamanna, Constantine S Tam and 20 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hematology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontline Therapy of CLL-Changing Treatment Paradigms.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Anthony R MatoCLL Program, Division of Hematological Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-8724-1875
Lindsey E RoekerCLL Program, Division of Hematological Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
John N AllanNew York Presbyterian & Weill Cornell, New York, New York.
John M PagelCenter for Blood Disorders and Stem Cell Transplantation, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Western Australia.
Danielle M BranderDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Brian T HillTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Bruce D ChesonLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Richard R FurmanNew York Presbyterian & Weill Cornell, New York, New York.
Nicole LamannaColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Constantine S TamPeter McCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VI, Australia.
Sasanka HandunnettiPeter McCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VI, Australia.
Ryan JacobsDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Frederick LansiganDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Erica BhavsarNew York Presbyterian & Weill Cornell, New York, New York.
Paul M BarrWilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Mazyar ShadmanFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Western Australia.
Alan P SkarbnikJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey.
Andre GoyJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey.
Douglas F BeachDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jakub SvobodaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jeffrey J PuPenn State Health, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Alison R SehgalUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Clive S ZentWilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6099-3313
Hande H TuncerTufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-8458-9649
Stephen J SchusterDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Peter V PickensAbington Hematology/Oncology Associates Inc., Willow Grove, Pennsylvania.
Nirav N ShahDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-4336-1071
Joanna RhodesDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Chaitra S UjjaniLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Chadi NabhanCardinal Health, Dublin, Ohio.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ibrutinib demonstrated superior response rates and survival for treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients in a pivotal study that excluded patients younger than 65 (<65) and/or with chromosome 17p13 deletion (del[17p13]). We examined outcomes and toxicities of CLL patients who would have been excluded from the pivotal study, specifically <65 and/or those with del[17p13]. This multicenter, retrospective cohort study examined CLL patients treated with front-line ibrutinib at 20 community and academic centers, categorizing them based on key inclusion criteria for the RESONATE-2 trial: <65 vs ≥65 and present vs absent del[17p13]. Of 391 included patients, 57% would have been excluded from the pivotal study. Forty-one percent of our cohort was <65, and 30% had del(17p13). Patients <65 were more likely to start 420 mg of ibrutinib daily; those who started at reduced doses had inferior PFS. The most common adverse events were arthralgias, fatigue, rash, bruising, and diarrhea. Twenty-four percent discontinued ibrutinib at 13.8 months median follow-up; toxicity was the most common reason for discontinuation, though progression and/or transformation accounted for a larger proportion of discontinuations in <65 and those with del(17p13). Response rates were similar for <65 and those with del(17p13). However, patients with del(17p13) had inferior PFS and OS. Ibrutinib in the front-line setting has extended beyond the population in which it was initially studied and approved. This study highlights and compares important differences in ibrutinib dosing, treatment interruptions, toxicities, reasons for discontinuation, and survival outcomes in two important patient populations not studied in RESONATE-2.

Indexed as

AdenineAgedAge FactorsChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Clinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesPyrazolesPyrimidinesRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesSequence DeletionAdenineibrutinibPiperidinesPyrazolesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID30132965
PMCPMC7552812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.