Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30132850›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2019

Health impact of delayed implementation of cervical cancer screening programs in India: A modeling analysis.

Nicole G Campos, Vivien Tsu, Jose Jeronimo, Catherine Regan, Stephen Resch, Andrew Clark, Stephen Sy, Jane J Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicole G CamposCenter for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-0840-4339
Vivien TsuPATH, Reproductive Health Global Program, Washington, DC.
Jose JeronimoPATH, Reproductive Health Global Program, Washington, DC.
Catherine ReganCenter for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Stephen ReschCenter for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Andrew ClarkDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen SyCenter for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Jane J KimCenter for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India has the highest burden of cervical cancer in the world. To estimate the consequences of delaying implementation of organized cervical cancer screening, we projected the avertable burden of disease under different implementation scenarios of a screening program. We used an individual-based microsimulation model of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer calibrated to epidemiologic data from India to project age-specific cancer incidence and mortality reductions associated with screening (once-in-a-lifetime among women aged 30-34 years) with one-visit visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and one- and two-visit HPV DNA testing. We then applied these reductions to a population model to project the lifetime cervical cancer cases and deaths averted under different implementation scenarios taking place from 2017 to 2026: (1) immediate implementation of screening with currently available screening tests (one-visit VIA, two-visit HPV testing); (2) immediate implementation of screening with currently available screening tests, with a switch to point-of-care one-visit HPV testing in 5 years; and (3) 5-year delayed implementation of screening with current screening tests or point-of-care HPV testing. Immediate implementation of two-visit HPV testing with a switch to one-visit HPV testing averted 574,100 cases and 382,500 deaths over the lifetimes of 81.4 million 30- to 34-year-old women screened once between 2017 and 2026. Delayed implementation with a one-visit HPV test averted 209,300 cases and 139,100 deaths. Delaying implementation of screening programs in high-burden settings will result in substantial morbidity and mortality among women beyond the age for adolescent HPV vaccination.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDelayed DiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceIndiaMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsSurvival RateUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung Adultcervical cancerHPV DNA testingmathematical modelingscreeningVIA

Identifiers

PMID30132850
PMCPMC6519250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.