Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30132369›Full record

SynthesisThe European journal of general practice2018

Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings' waiting rooms. A systematic review.

Christophe Berkhout, Suzanna Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Amy Willefert-Bouche, Jonathan Favre, Lieve Peremans, Paul Van Royen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The European journal of general practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. "I would not go to him": Focus groups exploring community responses to a public health campaign aimed at reducing unnecessary diagnostic imaging of low back pain.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christophe Berkhouta Department of General Practice/Family Medicine , Lille University , Lille , France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-4894
Suzanna Zgorska-Meynard-Moussaa Department of General Practice/Family Medicine , Lille University , Lille , France.
Amy Willefert-Bouchea Department of General Practice/Family Medicine , Lille University , Lille , France.
Jonathan Favrea Department of General Practice/Family Medicine , Lille University , Lille , France.
Lieve Peremansb Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care , University Antwerp , Antwerp , Belgium.
Paul Van Royenb Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care , University Antwerp , Antwerp , Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth promotion is part of GPs' commitments. Some waiting rooms have therefore been implemented with audiovisual aids (posters, pamphlets or screens) for health promotion purposes. Few studies have assessed the effect of audiovisual aids in primary care.

objectivesTo identify, describe and appraise studies that have investigated the effects of audiovisual aids on health promotion in primary healthcare waiting rooms. To determine which factors influence this impact through literature review.

methodsSystematic review. Two independent researchers using predefined keywords searched databases. Additional publications were extracted from the reference lists of the selected articles. The selection of the articles was performed on the title and abstract, followed by complete reading and assessment. Bias and level of evidence were analysed.

resultsA total of 909 articles were collected. Most of them were not in primary care settings. Fourteen peer-reviewed articles fully meeting inclusion criteria were included and analysed. Good quality studies were scarce. Eight of these articles using videos or slideshows on TV screens or tablets indicated effects: three of them were significant on patient knowledge with acceptable evidence and three on health behaviour on surrogate endpoints. Audiovisual aids seem to be used or noticed by patients and can induce conversations with physicians. The relevant factors that might influence these effects (duration of exposure, conception quality, theme, target population and time spent in the waiting room) are insufficiently investigated.

conclusionAudiovisual aids broadcasting messages using screens (TVs, computers, tablets, and smartphones with Bluetooth

Indexed as

Audiovisual AidsPrimary Health CareHealth BehaviorHealth FacilitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansPatient Education as Topicaudiovisual aidshealth promotionpatient education as topicPrimary healthcarewaiting room

Identifiers

PMID30132369
PMCPMC6104610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.