ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019
Outcome of Surgical Inspection of the Gallbladder in Relation to Final Pathology.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Safe, selective histopathological examination of gallbladder specimens: a systematic review.The British journal of surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Safety and cost of selective histopathological analysis for detecting cancer in surgical specimens: a systematic review.ANZ journal of surgeryPooled it
- [Is histological examination of every gallbladder really necessary? : A prospective and multicenter evaluation of 1040 cases].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study.The British journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Should all gallbladders be examined routinely or selectively by microscopy after cholecystectomy? Population-based Dutch study over a decade.The British journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRoutine histopathologic gallbladder examination after cholecystectomy has been a point of discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the macroscopic examination by the surgeon in relation to the final histology.
methodsA prospective study was conducted to investigate the practice of macroscopic gallbladder examination by a surgeon compared to routine histopathology by a pathologist. All consecutive cholecystectomies were included between November 2009 and February 2011.
resultsA total of 319 consecutive cholecystectomies were performed. Of all macroscopic examinations, the surgeon identified 62 gallbladders with macroscopic abnormalities, ranging from polyps to wall thickening or ulcers. In 55 (17.2%) cases, the surgeon judged that further examination of the specimen by the pathologist could possibly lead to additional and relevant findings. There was a strong agreement between the surgeon and the pathologist concerning the macroscopic examination (κappa = 0.822). The surgeon and the pathologist had disagreement on the macroscopic examination of 18 gallbladders, without clinical consequences for the patient. DISCUSSION: The present prospective study shows that the surgeon should be able to select those gallbladders needing a microscopic gallbladder examination. Potentially, about 80% of this kind of routine histology can be reduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30132295What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.