Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30132171›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018

The effect of female body mass index on in vitro fertilization cycle outcomes: a multi-center analysis.

Rashmi Kudesia, Hongyu Wu, Karen Hunter Cohn, Lei Tan, Joseph A Lee, Alan B Copperman, Piraye Yurttas Beim

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rashmi KudesiaReproductive Medicine Associates of New York, 635 Madison Avenue, 10th floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Hongyu WuCelmatix Inc., 14 Wall Street, Suite 16D, New York, NY, 10005, USA.
Karen Hunter CohnCelmatix Inc., 14 Wall Street, Suite 16D, New York, NY, 10005, USA.
Lei TanCelmatix Inc., 14 Wall Street, Suite 16D, New York, NY, 10005, USA.
Joseph A LeeReproductive Medicine Associates of New York, 635 Madison Avenue, 10th floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Alan B CoppermanReproductive Medicine Associates of New York, 635 Madison Avenue, 10th floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Piraye Yurttas BeimCelmatix Inc., 14 Wall Street, Suite 16D, New York, NY, 10005, USA. p.beim@celmatix.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to examine the impact of female body mass index (BMI) on IVF cycle outcomes.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study including 51,198 women who initiated their first autologous IVF cycle in 13 fertility centers in the USA between 2009 and 2015. The effect of underweight, overweight, and obese BMI on four different IVF cycle outcomes (cycle cancellation, oocyte and embryo counts, and ongoing clinical pregnancy [OCP]) was evaluated in logistic or Poisson regression analyses with confounders adjusted.

resultsWomen with an overweight or obese BMI experienced worse outcomes than those with a normal BMI. These differences included (1) greater odds of cycle cancellation (aOR [95%CI] 1.17 [1.08, 1.26] for overweight, 1.28 [1.15, 1.41] for class-I obesity, and 1.50 [1.33, 1.68] for class-II/III obesity, P < .001 for all); (2) fewer oocytes retrieved (aIRR [95%CI] 0.98 [0.98,0.99] for class-I obesity, 0.93 [0.92,0.94] for class-II/III obesity, P < .001 for both); (3) fewer usable embryos (aIRR [95%CI] 0.98 [0.97,0.99] for overweight, 0.97 [0.96,0.99] for class-I obesity, 0.95 [0.93,0.97] for class-II/III obesity, P < .01 for all); and (4) lower odds of OCP (aOR [95%CI] 0.89 [0.83,0.95] for class-I obesity, 0.86 [0.79,0.93] for class-II/III obesity, P < .001 for both). In a subgroup analysis based on primary infertility diagnosis, these trends persisted in those with male or uterine factor and were especially pronounced in women with ovulatory dysfunction or PCOS.

conclusionsA BMI above the normal range was an independent negative prognostic factor for multiple outcomes, including cycle cancellation, oocyte and embryo counts, and OCP. These negative outcomes were most profound in women with class-II/III obesity, ovulatory dysfunction, or PCOS.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemaleObesityOvulation InductionPolycystic Ovary SyndromePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesBody massInfertilityIVF/ICSI outcomeObesityPCOSPolycystic ovaries

Identifiers

PMID30132171
PMCPMC6240553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.