ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2018
[Robotics and augmented reality : Current state of development and future perspectives].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Technology Literacy in Undergraduate Medical Education: Review and Survey of the US Medical School Innovation and Technology Programs.JMIR medical education · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigitalization in surgery is gaining attention in the surgical community, with robotics and augmented reality as key issues. ROBOTICS: The term surgical robot is basically not adequate to describe currently available telesupport and manipulation systems. These are passive tools which have to be activated by the surgeon and only provide relatively low levels of active support. Accordingly, justification of use is currently difficult with respect to the cost-benefit relationship. A real breakthrough will be achieved by upgrading them into genuine intelligent and collaborative support systems and justify the term as the true meaning of robotics. AUGMENTED REALITY (AR): Augmented or enriched reality improves or facilitates normal sensory perception by the integration of additional information of a different nature. Intuitive perception of the surgical site would have the potential to revolutionize surgery, but prior to clinical use, the matching of the real and the virtual world still has to be optimized (referencing); however, AR is now already a valuable tool for training and simulation as well as workflow support in the operating room (OR). CRITICAL COMMENT AND PERSPECTIVES: The promising new technological development towards the future cooperative surgical OR environment, including both robotic and AR modules, will have a significant impact on surgery, even in the mid-term. Decisive for this is that surgeons actively take part in the evaluation of this process to ensure that future "intelligent" tools will remain mere assistant or supporting systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30132168What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.