Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30132154›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2019

Mutation heterogeneity between primary gastric cancers and their matched lymph node metastases.

Han Hong Lee, Su Young Kim, Eun Sun Jung, Jinseon Yoo, Tae-Min Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecular Pathology of Gastroesophageal Cancer.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predictive biomarkers in gastric cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular Pathology of Gastroesophageal Cancer.Surgical pathology clinics · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Han Hong LeeDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7541-8490
Su Young KimDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun Sun JungDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Jinseon YooCancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Tae-Min KimCancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. tmkim@catholic.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe acquisition of an invasive phenotype by a tumor cell is a crucial step of malignant transformation. The underlying genetic mechanisms in gastric cancer (GC) are not well understood.

methodsWe performed whole-exome sequencing of 15 pairs of primary GC and their matched lymph node (LN) metastases (10 primary GCs with single matched LNs and 5 primary GCs with three LNs per case, respectively). Somatic alterations including single nucleotide variations, short insertions/deletions including locus-level microsatellite instability and copy number alterations were identified and compared between the primary and metastatic LN genomes.

resultsMutation abundance was comparable between the primary GC and LN metastases, but the extent of mutation overlap or the mutation heterogeneity between primary and LN genomes varied substantially. Primary- or LN-specific mutations could be distinguished from common mutations in terms of mutation spectra and functional categories, suggesting that the mutation forces are not constant during gastric carcinogenesis. A spatial distribution revealed TP53 mutations as common mutations along with a number of region-specific mutations, such as primary-specific SMARCA4 and LN-specific CTNNB1 mutations. The subclonal architectures of common mutations were largely conserved between primary GC and LN metastatic genomes. The mutation-based phylogenetic analyses further showed that LN metastases may have arisen from homogeneous subclones of primary tumors.

conclusionsThe abundance and spatial distribution of mutations may provide clues on the evolutionary relationship between primary and matched LN genomes. Gene-level analyses further distinguished the early addicted cancer drivers such as TP53 mutations from late acquired region-specific mutations.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedMutationStomach NeoplasmsEvolutionGastric cancersLymph node metastasisMutationsSequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.