ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2019
Assessment of the stabilization of heavy metal contaminants in soils using chemical leaching and an earthworm bioassay.
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of ecotoxicological effects of Fojo coal mine waste elutriate in aquatic species (Douro Coalfield, North Portugal).Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Article
- Application of an Ecotoxicological Battery Test to the Paddy Field Soils of the Albufera Natural Park.Toxics · 2022Article
- Article
- Assessing the fractionation and bioavailability of heavy metals in soil-rice system and the associated health risk.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2022Article
- Bottom Ash Modification via Sintering Process for Its Use as a Potential Heavy Metal Adsorbent: Sorption Kinetics and Mechanism.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effect of simulated acid rain on stability of arsenic calcium residue in residue field.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Soil stabilization is a remedial technique that reduces the exposure of the soil environment to soil contaminants. Its efficacy can be assessed by determining whether the environmental availability of a contaminant decreases following treatment. We evaluated several chemical leaching treatments by assessing both contaminant leachability and bioaccumulation in the earthworm Eisenia fetida, and determined the most effective treatment for achieving soil stabilization. Soil samples contaminated with As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and/or Zn were collected from abandoned mine areas and stabilized by adding limestone and steel slag (5% and 2% w/w, respectively). All leaching and earthworm tests were conducted using both contaminated and stabilized soils. In addition to bioaccumulation in earthworms, several toxicity parameters (number of cocoons, growth changes, and survival rates) were also assessed to determine the effects of the treatments on the earthworms. The study showed that treatment of soil with EDTA-NH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.