Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30132087›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2018

Comparison of the occurrence of antibiotic residues in two rural ponds: implication for ecopharmacovigilance.

Dan Chen, Song Liu, Mengya Zhang, Shulan Li, Jun Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current perspective on veterinary drug and chemical residues in food of animal origin.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan ChenWuhan Institute for Food and Cosmetic Control, Wuhan, 430012, China.
Song LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Mengya ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Shulan LiDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China. wangj79@hotmail.com.
Wuhan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

Humanities and Social Science Foundation from Hubei province ministry of education 16Y023National Natural Science Foundation of China 81602108Research Program of Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Occupational Hazard Identification and Control OHIC2017G05Research Program of Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Occupational Hazard Identification and Control OHIC2017G07Research Program of Hubei Provincial Department of Education B2017012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a well-accepted drug-administration strategy for the minimization of environmental risks posed by pharmaceutical residues, ecopharmacovigilance (EPV) needs to guard against and control the pharmaceutical pollution sources. However, the underlying routes by which pharmaceuticals reach the environment vary significantly under different scenes, so it is necessary to implement different EPV measures in different backgrounds. This study detected the occurrence of antibiotic residues in two ponds within a Chinese rural community; assessed their ecological risks; compared and analyzed the geographic and demographic information, as well as the antibiotic-related anthropogenic behaviors of residents living around ponds, in order to trace the main entrances of antibiotics into the water environment; and then propose the EPV measures according to rural conditions. The results showed that the pollution degree of antibiotic residues was different between two studied ponds, which was manifested by the different antibiotic types and levels in water samples. And the possible main sources of antibiotic pollution in the studied rural water environment might include the application of human excretions and animal manures as fertilizers on the farmland, antibiotic use and inappropriate disposal in the clinic, and the direct disposal of the leftover antibiotics. From the perspective of drug administration, we then identified some suggestions on EPV measures which could be taken under existing rural conditions, including encouraging eco-directed sustainable prescribing of antibiotics in human and animals, improving take-back collection of unused antibiotics, building monitoring mechanism for antibiotic residues in the natural environment, identifying high-priority antibiotic residues, and implementing targeted EPV.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnvironmental PollutionPondsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAntibacterial drug administrationEcopharmacovigilance measuresPharmaceuticalsRural areaWater environment

Identifiers

PMID30132087
OpenAlexW2888609934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.