ArticlePediatric surgery international2018
Controversies in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair using a Delphi approach: from the American Pediatric Surgical Association Critical Care Committee (APSA-CCC).
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of extracorporeal life support and timing of repair in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2024Review
- Isolated aortic arch anomalies are associated with defect severity and outcome in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Article
- A nationwide database analysis of demographics and outcomes related to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Pediatric surgery international · 2021Article
- The Unrecognized Mortality Burden of Genetic Disorders in Infancy.American journal of public health · 2021Article
- Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a narrative review of controversies in neonatal management.Translational pediatrics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReview current practices and expert opinions on contraindications to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and contraindications to repair of CDH following initiation of ECMO.
methodsModified Delphi method was employed to achieve consensus among members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association Critical Care Committee (APSA-CCC).
resultsOverall response rate was 81% including current and former members of the APSA-CCC. An average of 5-15 CDH repairs were reported annually per institution; 26-50% of patients required ECMO. 100% of respondents would not offer ECMO to a patient with a complex or unrepairable cardiac defects or lethal chromosomal abnormality; 94.1% would not in the setting of severe intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). 76.5% and 72.2% of respondents would not offer CDH repair to patients on ECMO with grade III-IV ICH or new diagnosis of lethal genetic or metabolic abnormalities, respectively. There was significant variability in whether or not to repair CDH if unable to wean from ECMO at 4-5 weeks.
conclusionsSignificant variability in practice pattern and opinions exist regarding contraindications to ECMO and when to offer repair of CDH for patients on ECMO. Ongoing work to evaluate outcomes is needed to standardize management and minimize potentially futile interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V (expert opinion).
Indexed as
Identifiers
30132059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.