Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30131729›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2018

Social Cognition and Neurocognition in Schizophrenia and Healthy Controls: Intercorrelations of Performance and Effects of Manipulations Aimed at Increasing Task Difficulty.

Elizabeth Deckler, Gabrielle E Hodgins, Amy E Pinkham, David L Penn, Philip D Harvey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nonsocial and social cognitive function in psychosis: interrelationships, specificity and innovative approaches.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth DecklerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Gabrielle E HodginsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Amy E PinkhamSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
David L PennDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Philip D HarveyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
University of Miami · USAustralian Catholic University · AUThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Social Cognition Psychometric EvaluationR01MH093432 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HARVEY, PHILIP D., PENN, DAVID LEWIS · 2012 to 2016
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social cognition (SC) and neurocognition appear to predict different aspects of functional outcome in people with schizophrenia. However, the correlations between performance on these domains have not been tested extensively and compared cross-diagnostically with healthy controls. Further, some social cognitive measures appeared to have potential ceiling effects, particularly for healthy people, in previous research, so increasing their difficulty is of interest. In this paper we report on two studies wherein we examined the correlations between neurocognitive ability and performance on SC tests. In the first study the correlations between measures of social perception, emotion processing, and theory of mind and performance on a brief neuropsychological (NP) assessment were examined in 179 schizophrenia (SCZ) patients and 104 healthy controls (HC). In the second study, we instructed participants to perform a subset of the tasks as rapidly as possible in order to increase task difficulty, and we examined the effects of those instructions on task difficulty, task psychometrics, and correlations between SC and NP tests in 218 SCZ patients and 154 HC. In the first study, both HC and SCZ manifested a domain specific pattern of correlation between NP and SC test performance. Controlling for group differences in NP performance did not eliminate SC performance differences between the groups. In the second study, no differences in task performance, intercorrelations other SC tests, or test-retest stability were induced by the difficulty manipulation in the samples who performed the tasks with speed demands compared to the performance of the previous sample. These data suggest that simple manipulations aimed at increasing task difficulty may not have the desired effect and that despite consistent correlations between SC and NP test performance, impairments in social cognitive functioning are not fully explained by NP performance deficits.

Indexed as

disabilitymultivariate analysisneurocognitionsocial cognitiontask difficulty

Identifiers

PMID30131729
PMCPMC6091232
OpenAlexW2886060378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.