ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2018
BRCAness and prostate cancer: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.
Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Unravelling the molecular basis of PARP inhibitor resistance in prostate cancer with homologous recombination repair deficiency.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2024Review
- Unveiling the vulnerabilities of synthetic lethality in triple-negative breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023Review
- Review
- Beyond BRCA: The Emerging Significance of DNA Damage Response and Personalized Treatment in Pancreatic and Prostate Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Role of the DNA damage response in prostate cancer formation, progression and treatment.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2020Article
- Review
- Identification of Novel Biomarkers of Homologous Recombination Defect in DNA Repair to Predict Sensitivity of Prostate Cancer Cells to PARP-Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent advances in genetic sequencing and recent studies focusing on the broader use of Poly ADP Ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have led to an upsurge of interest in DNA repair mutations as they relate to prostate cancer.
methodsThis review outlines ongoing studies and recent publications as they relate to the prevalence and detection of DNA repair mutations in metastatic prostate cancer. The detection of these mutations through multiple diagnostic approaches is discussed, including germline sequencing, somatic sequencing, cell-free DNA assays, and circulating tumor cell assays. The clinical course of patients with prostate cancer and DNA repair gene mutations is explored in addition to therapeutic strategies for this population.
conclusionsIn men with metastatic prostate cancer, it is reasonable to obtain germline genetic sequencing as well as somatic tumor genomic sequencing to help guide further treatment decisions that may include PARP inhibitors or carboplatin in the future. In the future, in men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer with progression on PARP inhibitors, cell-free DNA sequencing may help elucidate mechanisms of resistance, which include reversion mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.