Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30131482›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Modified Methacrylate Hydrogels Improve Tissue Repair after Spinal Cord Injury.

Aleš Hejčl, Jiří Růžička, Kristýna Kekulová, Barbora Svobodová, Vladimír Proks, Hana Macková, Kateřina Jiránková, Kristýna Kárová, Lucia Machová Urdziková, Šárka Kubinová and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Therapeutic Strategies for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aleš HejčlInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic. ales.hejcl@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9206-1980
Jiří RůžičkaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic. stoupa-ruza@seznam.cz.
Kristýna KekulováInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic. kristyna.kekulova@iem.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0001-6451-9707
Barbora SvobodováInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic. barbora.svobodova@iem.cas.cz.
Vladimír ProksInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovského nám.2, 162 06 Praha, Czech Republic. proks@imc.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0001-7368-7120
Hana MackováInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovského nám.2, 162 06 Praha, Czech Republic. mackova@imc.cas.cz.
Kateřina JiránkováSecond Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic. jirankova.katerina@seznam.cz.
Kristýna KárováInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic. kristyna.karova@iem.cas.cz.
Lucia Machová UrdzikováInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic. urdzikl@saske.sk.
Šárka KubinováInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic. sarka.kubinova@iem.cas.cz.
Jiří CihlářDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, J. E. Purkyně University, České Mládeže 8, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic. jiri.cihlar@ujep.cz.
Daniel HorákInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovského nám.2, 162 06 Praha, Czech Republic. horak@imc.cas.cz.
Pavla JendelováInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic. pavla.jendelova@iem.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-4644-9212
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine · CZCharles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry · CZJan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methacrylate hydrogels have been extensively used as bridging scaffolds in experimental spinal cord injury (SCI) research. As synthetic materials, they can be modified, which leads to improved bridging of the lesion. Fibronectin, a glycoprotein of the extracellular matrix produced by reactive astrocytes after SCI, is known to promote cell adhesion. We implanted 3 methacrylate hydrogels: a scaffold based on hydroxypropylmethacrylamid (HPMA), 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) and a HEMA hydrogel with an attached fibronectin (HEMA-Fn) in an experimental model of acute SCI in rats. The animals underwent functional evaluation once a week and the spinal cords were histologically assessed 3 months after hydrogel implantation. We found that both the HPMA and the HEMA-Fn hydrogel scaffolds lead to partial sensory improvement compared to control animals and animals treated with plain HEMA scaffold. The HPMA scaffold showed an increased connective tissue infiltration compared to plain HEMA hydrogels. There was a tendency towards connective tissue infiltration and higher blood vessel ingrowth in the HEMA-Fn scaffold. HPMA hydrogels showed a significantly increased axonal ingrowth compared to HEMA-Fn and plain HEMA; while there were some neurofilaments in the peripheral as well as the central region of the HEMA-Fn scaffold, no neurofilaments were found in plain HEMA hydrogels. In conclusion, HPMA hydrogel as well as the HEMA-Fn scaffold showed better bridging qualities compared to the plain HEMA hydrogel, which resulted in very limited partial sensory improvement.

Indexed as

HydrogelsMethacrylatesNerve RegenerationAnimalsAxonsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersBlood-Brain BarrierConnective TissueDisease Models, AnimalExtracellular MatrixGene ExpressionNeovascularization, PhysiologicRatsSpinal Cord InjuriesTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersHydrogelsMethacrylatesconnective tissuehydrogellocomotor testneurofilamentsplantar testspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID30131482
PMCPMC6164213
OpenAlexW2888230679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.