Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30131109›Full record

ReviewHearing research2018

Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Lori L Holt, Adam T Tierney, Giada Guerra, Aeron Laffere, Frederic Dick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Phonetic category activation predicts the direction and magnitude of perceptual adaptation to accented speech.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lori L HoltDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. Electronic address: loriholt@cmu.edu.
Adam T TierneyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, WC1E 7HX, UK; Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.
Giada GuerraDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, WC1E 7HX, UK; Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.
Aeron LaffereDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.
Frederic DickDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, WC1E 7HX, UK; Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, London, WC1E 7HX, UK; Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.

Funding

LEARNING COMPLEX AUDITORY CATEGORIESR01DC004674 · NIDCD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI HOLT, LORI L, LOTTO, ANDREW J · 2001 to 2015
$3.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contribution of acoustic dimensions to an auditory percept is dynamically adjusted and reweighted based on prior experience about how informative these dimensions are across the long-term and short-term environment. This is especially evident in speech perception, where listeners differentially weight information across multiple acoustic dimensions, and use this information selectively to update expectations about future sounds. The dynamic and selective adjustment of how acoustic input dimensions contribute to perception has made it tempting to conceive of this as a form of non-spatial auditory selective attention. Here, we review several human speech perception phenomena that might be consistent with auditory selective attention although, as of yet, the literature does not definitively support a mechanistic tie. We relate these human perceptual phenomena to illustrative nonhuman animal neurobiological findings that offer informative guideposts in how to test mechanistic connections. We next present a novel empirical approach that can serve as a methodological bridge from human research to animal neurobiological studies. Finally, we describe four preliminary results that demonstrate its utility in advancing understanding of human non-spatial dimension-based auditory selective attention.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAttentionAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingHumansLearningModels, NeurologicalModels, PsychologicalPsychoacousticsSpecies SpecificitySpeech AcousticsSpeech PerceptionAuditory learningAuditory plasticityAuditory selective attentionPerceptual weightSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID30131109
PMCPMC6107307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.