Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30131083›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2019

Spared bottom-up but impaired top-down interactive effects during naturalistic language processing in schizophrenia: evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

Hugh Rabagliati, Nathaniel Delaney-Busch, Jesse Snedeker, Gina Kuperberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. When Proactivity Fails: An Electrophysiological Study of Establishing Reference in Schizophrenia.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hugh RabagliatiDepartment of Psychology,Tufts University,Medford,MA 02155,USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9828-5857
Nathaniel Delaney-BuschDepartment of Psychology,Tufts University,Medford,MA 02155,USA.
Jesse SnedekerDepartment of Psychology,Harvard University,Cambridge, MA 01238,USA.
Gina KuperbergDepartment of Psychology,Tufts University,Medford,MA 02155,USA.
Tufts University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Spatiotemporal Imaging of Language in SchizophreniaR01MH071635 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KUPERBERG, GINA R · 2005 to 2014
$5.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with schizophrenia process language in unusual ways, but the causes of these abnormalities are unclear. In particular, it has proven difficult to empirically disentangle explanations based on impairments in the top-down processing of higher level information from those based on the bottom-up processing of lower level information.

methodsTo distinguish these accounts, we used visual-world eye tracking, a paradigm that measures spoken language processing during real-world interactions. Participants listened to and then acted out syntactically ambiguous spoken instructions (e.g. 'tickle the frog with the feather', which could either specify how to tickle a frog, or which frog to tickle). We contrasted how 24 people with schizophrenia and 24 demographically matched controls used two types of lower level information (prosody and lexical representations) and two types of higher level information (pragmatic and discourse-level representations) to resolve the ambiguous meanings of these instructions. Eye tracking allowed us to assess how participants arrived at their interpretation in real time, while recordings of participants' actions measured how they ultimately interpreted the instructions.

resultsWe found a striking dissociation in participants' eye movements: the two groups were similarly adept at using lower level information to immediately constrain their interpretations of the instructions, but only controls showed evidence of fast top-down use of higher level information. People with schizophrenia, nonetheless, did eventually reach the same interpretations as controls.

conclusionsThese data suggest that language abnormalities in schizophrenia partially result from a failure to use higher level information in a top-down fashion, to constrain the interpretation of language as it unfolds in real time.

Indexed as

ComprehensionEye MovementsLanguageSpeech PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyVisual PerceptionEye movementslanguagepredictionschizophreniavisual-world paradigm

Identifiers

PMID30131083
PMCPMC6386628
OpenAlexW2888408026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.