Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30131071›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2018

Comparative effectiveness of physical activity interventions and anti-hypertensive pharmacological interventions in reducing blood pressure in people with hypertension: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

C Noone, C P Dwyer, J Murphy, J Newell, G J Molloy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05910255 (An In Depth Study Exploring Patient Experiences of Individuals Participating in Hypertension Clinical Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05910255 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An In Depth Study Exploring Patient Experiences of Individuals Participating in Hypertension Clinical Trials

TypeobservationalSponsorPower Life Sciences Inc.Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsHypertension
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hypertension: A Continuing Public Healthcare Issue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Earned Print and Digital Media in Advancing Hypertension Management Services in Punjab, India: A Descriptive Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C NooneSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland. chris.noone@nuigalway.ie.ORCID 0000-0003-4974-9066
C P DwyerSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
J MurphySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
J NewellSchool of Mathematics, Statistics & Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
G J MolloySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of hypertension is a major public health challenge. Despite it being highly preventable, hypertension is responsible for a significant proportion of global morbidity and mortality. Common methods for controlling hypertension include prescribing anti-hypertensive medication, a pharmacological approach, and increasing physical activity, a behavioural approach. In general, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of pharmacological and behavioural approaches for reducing blood pressure in hypertension. A previous network meta-analysis suggested that physical activity interventions may be just as effective as many anti-hypertensive medications in preventing mortality; however, this analysis did not provide the comparative effectiveness of these disparate modes of intervention on blood pressure reduction. The primary objective of this study is to use network meta-analysis to compare the relative effectiveness, for blood pressure reduction, of different approaches to increasing physical activity and different first-line anti-hypertensive therapies in people with hypertension.

methodsA systematic review will be conducted to identify studies involving randomised controlled trials which compare different types of physical activity interventions and first-line anti-hypertensive therapy interventions to each other or to other comparators (e.g. placebo, usual care) where blood pressure reduction is the primary outcome. We will search the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and PsycInfo. For studies which meet our inclusion criteria, two reviewers will extract data independently and assess the quality of the literature using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Network meta-analyses will be conducted to generate estimates of comparative effectiveness of each intervention class and rankings of their effectiveness, in terms of reduction of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence regarding the comparability of two common first-line treatment options for people with hypertension. It will also describe the extent to which there is direct evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of increasing physical activity and initiating anti-hypertensive therapy. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017070579.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureExerciseHypertensionHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAntihypertensive AgentsAnti-hypertensivesBlood pressureHypertensionNetwork meta-analysisPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID30131071
PMCPMC6103808
OpenAlexW2888463312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.